Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Week 1 & Season Predictions - A Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let's hear em'

 

Week 1:

Dare I say, a win?

I say, the defense surprises with 3+ sacks and 2 TOs.  Hubbard looks good, run game drives the offense to a 17-13 win.  Bryce is unremarkable but mistake free.  

 

Season:

6-11

  • A reworked roster looks much better than 2023's mess.  Still near the league bottom in some respects, but I think this defense is much better in the trenches than people anticipate. 
  • Top-12 run-defense, top-15 run-offense.  Passing defense is around 20ish, Passing-o is still mid to late 20s.  Just not 30-32
  • Jatavion Sanders is the rookie stud for us. 
  • Jonathan Brooks comes along in the second half as well.  Those two account for 1500 total yards. The Longhorn duo clicks.  
  • Thielen has a quieter season than people think with more of the young guys being folded in after week ~8ish.  

More specific stat predictions:

Defense-

  • Both Jewell & Jordan Fuller have themselves years and become fan faves.  They're gonna be the ones communicating on d pre-snap.  They're effective and good at what they do. 
  • Trevin Wallace shows up filling in at times
  • The Pass Rush indeed doesn't fair well, but Derrick Brown gets himself more sacks than we're used to seeing (5+).  Leota is who emerges as a decent option for us (5+ sacks).  Clowney (7+) but not a ton elsewhere.    
  • Horn plays 15+ games

Offense-

  • Bryce: 18 Pass TDs, 14 INTs, 3600 yards, 6.4 YPA (up from his historic low 5.5 to just standard low)
    • In other words, decent enough to confuse and keep the debate as annoying as ever for 2025
  • Hubbard: 900+ rushing yards, 10 TDs - fantasy sleeper folks
  • Brooks: 750+ rushing, 250+ receiving
  • Sanders: 500+ receiving
  • Diontae - Just ticks over 1,000.  Not a ton of TDs, but 95+ receptions

--

Y'all can me more concise, but let's throw some stuff out and see who lands.  

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 1 is going to set this board on fire. It's not going to be pretty and it's best to stay away for a while, unless you prefer to drown your sorrows alongside a lot of people who'll be making as many short jokes as possible. I have negative expectations for this game, but I do think Week 2 will go better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my team expectations are about in line with most. 4-6 wins but I think Bryce is better than we give him credit for and with Canales as his coach we will see what he can do. I think he will play better than most people's expectations. He will play like a first rounder this year and show us he can be our QB for the future. 

Happy My Song GIF by Justin

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 1: We lose a relatively close game.

Season: 4-13

Offense will improve slightly with Bryce playing better but not enough to convince fans and pundits that he is "The Guy." OL proves disappointing as injuries eventually become a factor.

Defense takes a step back, as the lack of depth and talent stand out. Not a precipitous drop off but noticeable as the season progresses.

Canales gives us a glimmer of hope but the offseason/draft moves temper that by proving to be a very mixed bag that sows doubt about Morgan's ability to improve enough upon the mess Fitterer left.

 

That's my overall season prediction.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm calling it an old school NFCSouth worst to first move. We win a gritty first game, Bryce gets knocked around a bit but toughs it out and gets some scores and a lot of confidence.

We lean heavy on the run game and two tight end sets throughout the fall, winning six games by mid-November. Cold weather sinks in quick and New Orleans and Atlanta struggle away from home, sinking their chances by Dec. 1 to make a push. Canales is in the running for division lead with his old team the Bucs, while Baker Mayfield is in the running with his old team as well. Somehow, but the end of the season, we string together a 9-8 season and sneak in as the division leaders after home wins against the Bucs and the Falcons.

The passing game is okay, but the running game between Hubbard and Sanders just punishes opponents early on and gives the team an identity. Jonathan Brooks is eased into the schedule in late October and is the lead back by the middle of November. He proves to be the perfect addition to the team, carrying on the punishing rushing attack and becoming a revelation as a pass catcher out of the back field.

Defensively, we perform slightly better as the run-heavy attack provides them with more time on the bench than the previous year and long fields to work with. A shaky secondary gels by the beginning of October into something respectable, but not great. Brown gains recognition as a mauling line breaker up front and Clowney shows he still has some in the tank, although his production falls off late in the season, still posting nine sacks on the year. 

We won't make it past the first round in the playoffs, but we'll make it back and we will be looking down the road at a solid team.

 

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO always plays the Panthers hard. 

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Week 1: We lose a relatively close game.

Season: 4-13

Offense will improve slightly with Bryce playing better but not enough to convince fans and pundits that he is "The Guy." OL proves disappointing as injuries eventually become a factor.

Defense takes a step back, as the lack of depth and talent stand out. Not a precipitous drop off but noticeable as the season progresses.

Canales gives us a glimmer of hope but the offseason/draft moves temper that by proving to be a very mixed bag that sows doubt about Morgan's ability to improve enough upon the mess Fitterer left.

 

That's my overall season prediction.

All of this. It's still a team picking in the top 5 again. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No telling about this week. I would like to think they avoid the interceptions and strip sacks but it is real easy to have those images in mind.

Just want to see 1 of 11. Ball out in under 2.7 seconds. Win LOS on run downs both sides. Not falling apart with false starts and holding infractions. 

Like to see the OL pick up one stunt.

Picked 6 wins when it was very optimistic, I'll stick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not one single pick that is asking me why we drafted a guy in the first place. It was a guy we needed and/or a guy that had certain traits making them stand out. Best of all, I feel everyone we drafted are capable of stepping onto the field this year and have a meaningful role (even Kuwatch on special teams). Obviously, nothing is guaranteed but I'm not seeing any huge flags on guys because they're risky projects or massive overreaches.
    • Here is how Morgan is strategic-He re-signs Scott because he was not going S in round 1--he had the chance, and he did not.  He saw the top of the draft at T and knew none of them would be ready to start day 1, so he signs a veteran to a one-year deal, giving his tackle selection a chance to learn and prepare for what might be LT or RT.  Those two moves suggested, perhaps ironically because they contradict each other, what he was going to do, based on the talent pool.  He never brought in a Robinson replacement at DE/NT, and then moves up to draft one.   I almost wonder if the intent was to draft DT/DE all along at some point, maybe with a trade back, but then Freeling dropped to them.   Of course, we felt that they were looking WR, and wonder if the plan was to draft a WR in round 2 if you traded back in round 1.  However, when Freeling was there, the trade back fell apart.  Then we traded up for Hunter.  We could stick with XL and hope Metchie steps up, so we sat still in round three and took Brazell II, a 1000 yard speedster and perfect Z WR.  What a break. At that time, CB and Center were our biggest needs, and with several possible centers on the board and a good fit for our defense at CB, we grabbed Will Lee III.  Lee and Thornton have people in front of them, but I think Morgan knew we needed a guy who can play the outside and press--and probably step in as Jackson's replacement in 2027.    After making trades to get back into the fifth round, where we grabbed one of the best centers in the draft.  This is significant because we signed Fortner to a one-year deal; maybe Morgan saw what some of us saw--the center position is strong in this draft--on day 3, and day 3 players need a year, in most cases.  Moments later, a safety they had been talking to whose skill set matched what we are looking for in a FS.  As stated, Scott was signed,  but the fact that the Panthers were talking to Wheatley and not Theiemann means that they might have known they were not going FS early, but would need a developmental FS later--which explains why we signed Scott.  So if you pay attention to the one-year, vet deals, you can tell where we planned to sign later-round, developmental players.  What positions did we draft early that did not have 1-year veterans signed in front of them:  DL (Hunter) and WR (I don't count Metchie because I count starting-level players). I would not be surprised to learn later that the plan was DT and WR in rounds 1 and 2--then Freeling fell.  Notice that Freeling--from Mt Pleasant SC, did not come in for a visit.  Most of the other OT candidates had short arms or were certain to be gone. I don't think Freeling was in their plans.  I think a trade back and Hunter and maybe Boston was the vision.  I am guessing that CB was also high on their list.   So in this draft, we got 
    • This is one area I think that is not getting enough exposure in the midst of all the optimism. I like Chuba a great deal from a personal standpoint but he has largely proven nothing on a consistent basis yet. He's had the one season of production but before that most people pegged us as moving on. And last year injuries or not he just did not have that juice. The rest of the guys are completely unproven. I don't see anyone among the group having a game or a handful of games worth of high level production the way Rico Dowdle did last year. And yeah he dropped off and yeah he got an attitude about our incompetent handling of the touches which was honestly justified on his part and he moved on but he did legitimately save our season. That's what it is going to take to seize control of the NFC South. We all know that we will not be passing all over defenses. It is what it is. So who amongst this RB group is capable of doing that? And if we are struggling to run the ball AND pass are we going to revert to making excuses for our coach and QB again? That is definitely getting old.
×
×
  • Create New...