Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Bryce Young Panthers are unwatchable. It's time to release him or trade him.


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Who wants to trade for a #1 overall pick who is a bust?  The Panthers would bite, but we would be the ones trying to make the trade.  No other organization is that stupid.

A 7th rounder is looking like a shot at someone who could be better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hasn't had time to develop yet , it's the oline, wrs that are holding him back, he is better than Joe Namath, Joe Montana, Jhon Elway, Peyton Manning and Tom Brady , he just needs more time to develop 

After 4-5 seasons has the unchallenged starter , then we will surely see his greatness 

Edited by Day1PanthersFan
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe Bear said:

Ordinarily yes, but look at that defensive lineup. 2015 Cam might get you to 3-14. It's a swiss-cheese offense and no FA QB or Dalton is going to get a win. 16 more losses til draft time.

Then we should just rest starters for the  the season at least good ones. Brown, Moton and the billion dollar guards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Does Young even want to play in the NFL? His body language says no. Why doesn't he just fake an injury and call it a career if he doesn't want to be out there?

I don’t believe he does. He’s got his money, and he knows he’s only one play away from a life changing chronic pain type injury when he gets hit by a giant. I don’t know if there is a forfeiture clause in players contracts, but I could see him sucking so bad that he has to get benched and probably never have to play again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

I don’t believe he does. He’s got his money, and he knows he’s only one play away from a life changing chronic pain type injury when he gets hit by a giant. I don’t know if there is a forfeiture clause in players contracts, but I could see him sucking so bad that he has to get benched and probably never have to play again. 

I'm pretty sure he knew he was a bust right away and is just going threw the motions. Keeping him out there sends a terrible message to the rest of the team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shotgun said:

I'm pretty sure he knew he was a bust right away and is just going threw the motions. Keeping him out there sends a terrible message to the rest of the team.

The main reason they’re struggling so bad out the gate is the players know Bryce doesn’t have it. Even Bryce seems to know he doesn’t have it. Bryce won’t score a TD against a team’s starting defense until the game is well out of reach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

When aren’t we getting our ass kicked? It’s a valid argument. Bryce has not shown anything to be excited about. 

It really isn’t. You aren’t cutting a first round pick after 17 starts and if he is so bad who is trading for him right now?

It’s a dumb unrealistic scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I’m annoyed at the stroud revisionism because the 2023 class was supposed to be not good overall.

It’s not revisionism. We are watching these things play out in real time. The #2 and #3 pick are out there playing a classic game and our guy looks like my little sister throwing a football. She’s 40 years old and 5’ 3”. I’m not gonna go into a we should have taken Stroud because if we took him he would look like BY probably because this organization is fundamentally trash, but today we lost to a really, really, really bad Saints team in historic, laughable fashion. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The main reason they’re struggling so bad out the gate is the players know Bryce doesn’t have it. Even Bryce seems to know he doesn’t have it. Bryce won’t score a TD against a team’s starting defense until the game is well out of reach. 

This was obvious 3 games into last season but here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...