Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Line PFF grades


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, NAS said:

image.thumb.png.8dbd7e902b01b13091a06430508cf356.png
 

offensive line was not the issue despite the 4 sacks

Of course it wasn't. The offense struggled because Young struggled. Anyone who watch the oline last season a watch the oline yesterday has to know it was night and day different.  Was it perfect? Hell no. But it was good enough to say they were not the reason they lost.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bryce is over processing and not relying on instincts at all. which is why he is holding on to the ball so long.  Hes doubting himself, his skill, everything.  This is the epitome of being shell shocked as an NFL QB.  He has to get out of his own head and just play football.

Edited by chknwing
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Weird to see Moton as the weak link. 

That’s not terrible for their ranks either.

We gave him time, OL played well. Diontae and Adam were schemed open. Hell, Sanders, Mingo and Legette created some room at times. 

For at least 3 of the sacks, Bryce had the chance to work presnap and call protections and he just sat and took the snap. 

The QB is not sufficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chknwing said:

I think Bryce is over processing and not relying on instincts at all. which is why he is holding on to the ball so long.  Hes doubting himself, his skill, everything.  This is the epitome of being shell shocked as an NFL QB.  He has to get out of his own head and just play football.

I'm not sure he will be able to recover from his time here. If he had any chance at all to succeed it vanished like a fart in the wind yesterday. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The team addressed the o-line, WR’s, TE, RB in the offseason. Even after the disaster yesterday, I can see they are a QB away from having a presentable offense. They have playmakers. Unfortunately Bryce is not one of them. 
Seems like a good kid, but just does not have “it”. Can you imagine 2015 Cam with this o-line and playmakers? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He's got a lot of miles on him. He's been a solid RT for his entire career but it will not last forever. I'm surprised he's held up this long to be honest. I don't think he's missed a game in like...ever.

I didn't mean to come off snarky or anything, it's just weird to see after years of him and no one else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...