Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young benched


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ImfromClayton said:

I just hope this was Canales' decision and not Teppers. I am fine with any decision the head coach makes. 

Easy money is on Tepper no matter what Canales said.  It’s fits Tepper’s ways of doing business…..and it sure didn’t sound like Canales was even entertaining the thought 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what NFL teams records are after benching their starting qb. I know the backup boost is a thing but does it result in wins? Also start the damn presser already. 15 minutes of nfl films soundtrack on repeat 

Edited by RJK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

Easy money is on Tepper no matter what Canales said.  It’s fits Tepper’s ways of doing business…..and it sure didn’t sound like Canales was even entertaining the thought 

You don't respond the way Canales did in the post game presser if you have any agency of that decision.  He had his weekly 1 on 1 this morning and learned that Tepper had pulled the plug on him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Young for what we can to a team who think they can make something out of him, because the Panthers certainly are in no position to do so.

And frankly I question at this point if he's NFL material.

This is the right call. Bench him and let Dalton help develop our young nucleus. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we can evaluate the rest of the team! Ohh and go ahead an put Plumber on the roster now. No need to trot out Young again yet if Dalton goes down. No chance he plays the rest of the games so just do that now.

It's going to be weird watching watchable Panther football with Dalton out there and I am ready for it even if it's not enough for wins. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Good riddance.  I do pretty well for myself but I can’t imagine making millions to be complete dog poo at my job and not giving a damn about it in the process.  May he never see the field for this team again.  Scram!

Are you sure we aren't going to let him sit and learn and try this again next season?

 

This could mean he's back next season sadly. I hope I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...