Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A closer look at the first sack


Newtcase
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

OL wasn’t credited with allowing any sacks yesterday. Who blew what assignment is something neither we nor analysts will ever know, but it looked to be in Sanders to me. 

I thought the analyst on the broadcast mentioned it.

But yes, we don't know for sure what their assignments were.

Edited by csx
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

Seems to be the consensus.  

Yep I think the unemotioned aspect so far that you missed is this is a play action pass and it certainly looks to be designed to show Ickey blocking down to sell the run fake initially.... the fact that Mingo blocked the outside man also shows this.... JT should have been responsible for the inside man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Sanders blocked moton, both were failed blitz pick up by the backs as I pointed out above Jatavion Sanders trying to block a guy 10+ yards from the QB instead of the guy in his face is the real problem here.

No that’s his assignment… the issue here is that someone else missed their assignment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Yep I think the unemotioned aspect so far that you missed is this is a play action pass and it certainly looks to be designed to show Ickey blocking down to sell the run fake initially.... the fact that Mingo blocked the outside man also shows this.... JT should have been responsible for the inside man.

JT did what he was supposed to do on this play. Cross the line and take the outside edge. It’s a cross line block and that’s his assignment… not the free rusher that Icky missed. It’s supposed to look like the run with the same motion. On the run play the TE goes to the outside. This was not on JT at all… it’s on Icky. 
 

with line play, you do your assignment as the play is drawn up and rely on your team mates to do the same. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...