Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would you do with our guaranteed top 3 draft pick?


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

trade down a handful of spots for an extra 2nd and future 1st, absolutely.

with the amount of needs and overall lack of talent, taking that 100 times out of 100

I seriously doubt we draft more than 10 players. A future first is possible, dont see more than 1 tho. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I seriously doubt we draft more than 10 players. A future first is possible, dont see more than 1 tho. 

The late round picks are whatever. Just have a normal 3 picks in the first 3 rounds. Adding an extra 2nd and future picks wouldn't be anything crazy.

Not sure where this "we got 10 picks so can't trade down!" comes from. Panthers have tons of holes, could use all the picks they can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to go BPA for 2-3 years this team is so devoid of talent. We actually did that going into and at the beginning of the Rhule era and had a good handful of talent. Then we flip flopped strategy between rebuild and win now every year and traded everybody away for ham sandwiches. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

This team needs SO much, desperately needs a huge infusion of talent

So... no matter how bad these upcoming QB prospects are... hype them to the absolute stratosphere to the media. Hell, hire a PR team to hype them up 24/7.

Then sell the pick for some massive trade offer to some dumb team that buys the hype. BPA, BPA and BPA some more. Stack the team with talent.

The  QB that we pass on will become a hall of famer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

The  QB that we pass on will become a hall of famer.

Teams keep chasing QBs every draft like that's the case, overdrafting and throwing crazy resources at QBs hoping they'll land the next Brady or Mahomes.

I'd rather take a haul of draft picks, stack the team with talent and let some other team take that (almost certainly losing) gamble.

Sure, if you really feel the guy there is the next great elite QB, take him. I just seriously doubt that's going to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Wait a minute, I thought Dalton was going to save our season? What happened to all the positivity after we blew out a terrible Vegas team and hung with a Bengals team that lost to the Ravens today? Yall make me LOL

No one said the season was saved.  People said the game is much more watchable and we might go from 0 wins this season to 4 or 5.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...