Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers will not trade Chuba Hubbard


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I take it you do?

I’d say you can look at successful teams and then look at the Panthers and spot some very basic differences…

so yeah, I think one thing you don’t do in todays NFL is pay big 2nd contracts to RBs (Sanders), spend a 2nd round pick on a RB, and then pay a big 2nd contract to a vet  again (with Hubbard). 

but maybe you can find me a good team doing that in todays NFL.  Playing the Panthers are smarter and shouldn’t be challenged is a bold strategy given we are the biggest clown show in all of pro sports 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

If you’re leaking he won’t be traded you have to resign him. 

like now. 

lock up the RB for whomever the next young qb is. 

Well one way or another it helps give him more leverage. We did the same thing with Burns. It only got worse from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, PantherKyle said:

Not similar to other examples imo. He's a good RB. Not an elite RB, or play a premier position. With Brooks, I would use assets elsewhere. 

That's what people said about McCaffrey, and Moore, too. It's always wrong.

He's averaging 5.6 yards per carry and nearly 100 yards a game. He's driven, and wants to excel. Pay the man. I'm sick of being a farm team.

Edited by TN05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TN05 said:

That's what people said about McCaffrey, and Moore, too. It's always wrong.

He's averaging 5.6 yards per carry and nearly 100 yards a game. He's driven, and wants to excel. Pay the man. I'm sick of being a farm team.

Everyone called CMC elite.

And Moore was shipped in order to get a perceived franchise QB. Way diff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...