Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We have to figure out our future core team


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, SCO96 said:

I think D. Brown is good but not great. 8 sacks in 4 seasons is pretty lackluster in a passing league. In his defense, I do think he would be better if he had better players around him. That said, I don't think he'd ever be the best player on a GREAT DEFENSE.

Derrick Brown is a defensive tackle, not a pass-rushing edge. He's not supposed to be a 10 sack-per-year player.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joe Bear said:

Derrick Brown is a defensive tackle, not a pass-rushing edge. He's not supposed to be a 10 sack-per-year player.

I have to be a good bit older than you. I grew up in a time where I saw great DT's get 10+ sacks per year. I saw all of the following guys menace QBs from the interior line: Mean Joe Green, Randy White, John Randle, Warren Sapp, Cortez Kennedy, Jerome Brown. These guys would would get near or surpass the 10 sack mark consistently year in and year out.

Before them you had guys like Rosey Grier, Bob Lily, Merlin Olsen, and Alan Page...who once won NFL Player of the Year...as a freaking DT tackle!

In recent season we've seen guys like Aaron Donald and Fletcher Cox bring terror with their interior pressure.

Derrick Brown just signed a 4 year/96 million extension. That's $24 mil per year. He may not get 10 sacks a season. But, is it  unreasonable to expect 4 or 5 a year? That's a sack every 3 games. DB may make a lot of tackles in the run game, but this is a PASSING LEAGUE. He set a tackling mark for DTs, but only twice did he tackle a QB in a live game behind the like of scrimmage. He's a good player, but he's being paid like a  great/extraordinary player.

I personally believe he'd fair better in a 4-3 defense with stud DE on the edge and a complementary player beside him in the trenches.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2024 at 3:00 PM, ForJimmy said:

Keep developing this draft class (XL, Coker, JT, Brooks, Wallace should get plenty of snaps as starters).  Build around DB on defense, make a decision on Horn.  Hunt, Icky, and Lewis are good for the next couple years.  Sell off anyone else that can get you decent value and keep drafting.  

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching the Luke interview, it was striking how much not only he, but his teammates as well, loved the game of football. They lived and breathed it. Greg, TD, Luke, Cam, etc. Luke talked about how instrumental it was in his development. 

Besides Horn and maybe Brown, I’m not sure we have anyone that truly lives and breathes this game. That’s a big, big problem. 

Not only do we lack talent, the cupboard is completely devoid of vet players who straight up love football. We’ve got dudes that play like it’s just a job, and they get paid regardless. 

I’m not really sure how to fix this. We have to have at least 2 INCREDIBLE drafts where we luck in to a few gamebreakers. As it is right now, any vet we bring in to this ish hole on a big $ contract is sure to get stale and check out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jtm said:

You mean the strategy of trading players for draft picks and then having an immediate need at the position you just traded isn't a winning strategy?  

We’ve got no winning strategy. Had we traded Burns and Moore when we got great offers, we’d have been in great shape if we just took the guys taken at those picks and in one case drafted the top WR available to replace Moore. It can absolutely be a winning strategy. If you sell off the same guys a year later for spare change and use it to trade up for a shitty QB, it doesn’t work. Our GM fuged us. It’s that simple. Had nothing to do with one way being better than another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Not part of our future or present even, just getting paid 

Is there any other team that’s signed so many hurt guys or guys coming off serious surgeries? We seem to throw out big money for guys like Paradis, Okung and Wonnum and get little to no return. It’s like we’re surprised when it doesn’t work out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to find some players worthy of being part of the core first. I like our OL for the most part. We have some young guys who may become part of the core. Brown is a beast. But honestly, how many "core players" do we truly have? A small handful at most. We largely have NFL backups and borderline roster caliber types.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2024 at 1:04 PM, kungfoodude said:

The real question is how long will we have to wait to get them?

I said it at the time and stand by it still, if Bryce was a bust (which I figured about an 80% chance of being one), we are looking at a minimum of 4, probably 5 years of having a 0% chance of even sniffing a playoff spot. So we are on year 2, so really at least 3 more years before it's time to start to talk about playoffs again. In other words, I wouldn't worry about making the playoffs until the Fall of 2028.

This is what people warn about when you get idiots like Tepper throwing out these insane trades because he just wants the first pick so badly. All these people cheer because they are excited at the time for that pick, but when reality hits them in the face with "don't even think about playoffs until 2028" you'll see them start crying. But that's the reality when you have an idiot like Tepper as owner. And the even harsher reality is if Tepper is still involved in 2028, there is 0% chance of a playoff spot no matter who our roster has. The Panthers are guaranteed not to play in a single playoff game if he is involved. I said this 3 years ago and ill stand by that 3 years from now. People will have to face reality.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...