Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or GoogleĀ accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account.Ā 

    Members receive fewer adsĀ , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

    Ā 

Ian Rapoport: Bryce Young could re-take starting QB spot with a good performance


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bryce is not overtaking anything but a waiver or trade spot. This reminds me of that one year where Jake magically had a thumb injury which necessitated his benching. Andy gets in a car wreck (thankful he and his family are ok - hoping the other party is ok too) and he somehow walks away with a thumb injury in his throwing hand?Ā 

beginning of the end for both QBs in Carolina.Ā 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Worst case scenario he wins us 4 games which puts us out of QB range in the draft and we end up with him as the starter next season and we repeat this nonsense all again.

Ā 

Sometimes you have to think about the worst case scenario.

We wake up in it daily. But thinking he is going to come on and take this team 4-6 the rest of the way?Ā  That's kind of unlikely.Ā 

Worst case might be he looks really good for a half, gets injured, and people have all that time to talk themselves back into him.Ā 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

It’s unserious to think that 1 amazing performance would make up for his overall body of work. He’s guaranteed horrible. He’s going to play terrible and his teammates won’t play hard for him.Ā 

I agree, it’s wild that some think bc he has one good game, it automatically assumes he’s good, I don’t know how sports media has forgotten 16 games last year and two this year. It’s been abysmal. Yes Andy was bad against the bears and commanders, but he was ten times better than Bruce against LV, ATL and cincy.Ā 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see it.

But for him to not only look "better" (nowhere to go but up from one of the worst ever) but like a real bonafide franchise QB and take back the starting job would be one of the more improbable turnarounds in sports history. We'll see.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'd love to see it.

But for him to not only look "better" (nowhere to go but up from one of the worst ever) but like a real bonafide franchise QB and take back the starting job would be one of the more improbable turnarounds in sports history. We'll see.

It is impossible because the Panthers ruined him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and ā€œwin the offseasonā€ don’t show the results in the regular season.Ā  Ā  As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ā€˜85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.Ā  Ā  just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...