Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Panthers turning down trade interest in other players


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

they leak this every time they give a player away for nothing 

 

there’s a reason for it: when you foster an identity as a soft negotiating team it makes it harder and harder to dig your heels in. 
 

they just keep giving in though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I'm over Morgan. The only good thing he has done is the Jackson trade. Paying a RB and CB given the state of the team is just the wrong move and this is the last chance at much value. Hell their still paying his Sanders mistake while Brooks is still not ready. The team isn't going to win anything so why not hit the reset on the rookie contracts and actually stop with the poorly conceived retools. This last one really stunk. 

Fixed the OL. 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I'm over Morgan. The only good thing he has done is the Jackson trade. Paying a RB and CB given the state of the team is just the wrong move and this is the last chance at much value. Hell their still paying his Sanders mistake while Brooks is still not ready. The team isn't going to win anything so why not hit the reset on the rookie contracts and actually stop with the poorly conceived retools. This last one really stunk. 

Rb yes, CB no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know they are paying Chuba. We do know that there is a need for RB because we aren't a passing team, or we are diminished now in that regard.

And we have not seen Brooks. 

Maybe they are trading Sanders instead. I would be. At least trying to trade him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This core of less than mediocrity cannot be bought!!

Oh, but who is the next polite, historically undersized QB who has less than average atlecticism, transferable NFL skills that scouts will code as "anticipation"?

Look I am not an NFL scout or a douchey owner of a team but if If his comp of the next top pick  is a point guard and not a QB.... I am ALL IN!

For me, the super bowl is botching the #1 pick when it is obvious in real time that the odds are against it work to an average outcome...the only way to mentally cope with the Tepper era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherKyle said:

Fixed the OL. 

Yes overspending on talent for 1 win. That's not impressive to me. Given the limits it put on everything else it's not a win in my eyes. Also looking like Moton might be done at those prices with Ickey coming up for his contract next, who is really should be an OG. Seems more like an expensive patch and less like a fix. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I know. With a solid off-season and a good draft this team could actually be good next season. We just need to finally solve the QB position and fix the defense. Which feels like a monumental task. 

They could be massively improved, but there is no way to fix that defense in one year, so 'good' I am not so sure about. 

But yeah they could be much better with competent QB play on offense. 

I see too many holes still on offense and it worries me for the defense because you can see where the priorities lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Rb yes, CB no

No to RB. You can literally pick a good one up when you need it. Just look at Philly and Baltimore. The 49ers rented the best one and effectively replaced him already with an UDFA from 2022. I like Hubbard but we should be selling. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...