Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan Pie Thread


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Wow what a swing in fan sentiment after being gifted a win by a very bad Saints team giving away penalties all game. 

It was a bad Saints team for sure, but I'm not taking anything away from this draft class.

XL, Wallace, Sanders, & Coker is already better than any draft Fitterer ever had.

And we get Brooks next week.

This team still has a LONG ways to go to being competitive on an ongoing basis, but this was objectively a great win given where the team is at.

And it's fair to be excited about this rookie class.  We need another one like this to overcome the damage of the previous regime's though, for sure

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's the GM of a 2-7 team and he's made some awful decisions -- with more coming before the trade deadline. But that's a hell of a lot better than being the GM of a 1-8 team, and he's a better drafter than Fitterer. I'll give him that.

Now, prove he's better at making trades than any GM in NFL history other than Fitterer, and we'll be talking.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morgan is doing fine. There isn't a GM in this league that has hit on every player drafted or signed. 

Free Agency 

Offensively our signing are good. Addressed the line. 

Defensively not so good but I believe that these players were added to complement Brown. Without Brown they are subpar. 

Many have said before. We have to give him time. I liks his approach. 

Draft

Top 4 picks can be core players along with Coker. 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...