Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs. Giants in München


Chief_Chokeaho
 Share

Recommended Posts

Bryce has changed. He is much more calm and is throwing the ball well out of the pocket. 

But, he’s still not a franchise QB. he can’t throw deep. and if you can’t throw deep, you aren’t a playoff QB. 

Hes at least proven capable of being a decent backup QB though. not what you want to hear for a number one overall you traded up for though. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, BC is getting beat pretty regularly if you watch, so I don't think Ikey being back would be worse. Minus his problem with penalties.

Plus, Ikey is literally one of our best run blockers.

...alls I can say is ***** Ickey....we want him to be good.... I keep pulling for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CBDellinger said:

You celebrate victory anytime it happens in the nfl. 1 play, 1 quarter 1 game… if you don’t you’re just gonna be a loser. Confidence is king.  

Well, there is today and there is building this team going forward.  I mean Dwyane Jarrett could come out of the stands and catch a TD pass.   We could celebrate the TD.   But we could also talk about if he should be on the field for us big picture 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

but if you only look decent vs the worst of the NFL….does that make you decent?  And that where Bryce is, somehow okay vs disaster teams 

Understood. But I like how he's trusting his protection and utilizing lesser known receivers (3 rookies).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We really going to end up with the #8 pick and Bryce starting at QB again aren't we?

 

I knew this franchise would screw up the #1 pick. Just some sad poo how we keep doing this to ourselves.

 

We are bad enough to gift another team the #1 pick, but we aren't bad enough to actually help us smh.

 

 

I'd much rather have a confident team and the #8 pick. Bryce (Stroud) and now Caleb Williams (Daniels) prove that the consensus #1 overall doesn't mean poo. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...