Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay Unsure T-mac is a wr 1 or X..


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

It will be interesting to see who is still available at #4.  There could be a player someone drastically needs and will be willing to give up a nice haul to get him.  Getting an extra round one pick in 2026 would be nice. 

In my dream, we somehow luck into a top 2 pick and someone wants a QB bad and doesn’t want anyone else to jump them. Somehow we’ll probably screw up the picks anyway, but it would be nice to do even partially what Chicago did to us.

We’d have to lose out, which is a decent possibility unless Tampa is resting. We need Atlanta to stay within a game because Atlanta beat Tampa twice.

The rest of the draft slots are who knows because Jax plays the Raiders and then Tennessee and you never know who will rest starters. I think we are top 7 unless we somehow pull out 2 more wins. The 4 win teams have higher SOS and there is only one 5 win team with the same SOS. If we win 1 of 3, we still should stay in top 7. If we lose out and the Jax games work for us, we can easily be top 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

In my dream, we somehow luck into a top 2 pick and someone wants a QB bad and doesn’t want anyone else to jump them. Somehow we’ll probably screw up the picks anyway, but it would be nice to do even partially what Chicago did to us.

Even in your dream, they would end up drafting Cam Ward instead of doing that lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

But in all honesty the combine is gonna be big for him. Can't go running a 4.6 we've seen enough Kneal Harry's and Treadwells flame out. But if he checks all the boxes I'm all for him being our pick 

I've seen no tape to think he will run faster than 4.6

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People say Evans or Higgins, I'll go similar but he gives me heavy Drake London feel (after the catch movement) with a little bit of Michael Pittman (the way he high points and aggressively outduels defenders).  Went to HS in SoCal...surprised he wasn't recruited by USC haha.  

He's a solid solid prospect.  Would have no problem with him R1.  It's not a top heavy draft so he's in play.  Same goes for Burden honestly.  

Put those guys vs. Johnson vs. Graham, it's a tough call IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

First round?  This guy really that level of player?  I know he's a workhorse for Penn State, but first round?

A lot of boards have soared him up to late teens and early 20’s. But yeah I can’t imagine reaching that high for TE when Sanders is on the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PappyMay said:

A lot of boards have soared him up to late teens and early 20’s. But yeah I can’t imagine reaching that high for TE when Sanders is on the roster. 

There is a player from Bowling Green (Fannin?) who is right there--but the lack of difference-makers at TE (except maybe Brock Bowers last year) is lowering their stock a bit--Pitts at 4 to Atlanta, Noah Fant, Hayden Hurst, OJ Howard, Evan Ingram, Eric Ebron---to name a few--some solid players, but you can get solid TEs in round 3.  

I will go out on a limb---no TE in round 1 this year.  I said it.  By April, nobody will remember.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

There is a player from Bowling Green (Fannin?) who is right there--but the lack of difference-makers at TE (except maybe Brock Bowers last year) is lowering their stock a bit--Pitts at 4 to Atlanta, Noah Fant, Hayden Hurst, OJ Howard, Evan Ingram, Eric Ebron---to name a few--some solid players, but you can get solid TEs in round 3.  

I will go out on a limb---no TE in round 1 this year.  I said it.  By April, nobody will remember.

I completely agree. If we don’t resign Tremble I’m fine taking one in round 3 or 4 to lock the position down for 2-3 years but I’d be irritated if either of our first 2 rounders were spent on TE. To me would feel like a luxury pick like last year in the 2nd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cards weren't really blitzing that much the entire game.  The ones they sent just wrecked Bryce.  My opinion is you are over fixated on what happened as we got close to the goal.   The one possession we had in the 3rd quarter? That was a freebie to get down there.  It was literally just checkdowns to the TE when we weren't running the ball down... taking up the entire quarter.  Next quarter Cards were inviting the exact same behavior.  Which is why you got those back to back clock eating small ball 14 play drives.  Featuring RB and TE easy catches. 
    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
×
×
  • Create New...