Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Canales final update on injuries and comments on Pete Carroll


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Horn.   Doubtful    couldn’t practice today   Dane Jackson here or for smith wade 

Moton.   Out.     Chisson (sp) will replace him,  not Brady 

Josie   Out.    Chandler maybe 

Chau smith wade   Out 

I couldn’t catch all the names filling in …linebackers are well…you know. 

dave better do a whole lot of successful clock eating in his play calling 

 

Playing

A’shon,  Clowney ,    Xaiver , Damien and Chuba 

Talks about Pete Carroll possibly becoming Bears Hc  said would be great for the Bears 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuba Hubbard (knee) is questionable but expected to play in Week 17 against the Buccaneers.
Head coach Dave Canales said after Friday’s practice that the team expects Hubbard to play in Week 17 despite the questionable designation. The Panthers’ RB1 will be in line for another solid workload for this week’s fantasy championship matchups and should be fired up in all formats as a fringe RB1/RB2.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Xavier Legette (wrist/hip) is questionable for Week 17 against the Buccaneers.
Despite being listed as questionable, head coach Dave Canales has said the plan is for Legette to play against the Buccaneers. The rookie receiver hasn’t found the end zone since Week 9 and hasn’t had a top-24 PPR week since Week 4. With Adam Thielen also back and soaking up targets, It’s hard to view Legette as anything more than a WR5 at this time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Evans would have had a big day even with Horn playing. If nothing else, all they had to do was line him up on the other side of the field opposite Horn.

Yes and when Canales was asked why he doesn't put horn on Evans all day, he basically said because that's too complicated.

He discussed movements and shifts how horn moving with Evans pre snap will change everyone's assignments...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...