Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Graham is gone, fo you take Carter?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s very likely that all of Will Johnson, Mason Graham, and Tetairoa McMillan will be gone.

A safety hasn’t gone in the top 10 since Jamal Adams in 2017. But if there’s a safety that deserves to go in the top 10 it’s Malaki Starks.

He graded top 10 against the run and the pass at his position and his ball skills are insane.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MillionDollarCam said:

It’s very likely that all of Will Johnson, Mason Graham, and Tetairoa McMillan will be gone.

A safety hasn’t gone in the top 10 since Jamal Adams in 2017. But if there’s a safety that deserves to go in the top 10 it’s Malaki Starks.

He graded top 10 against the run and the pass at his position and his ball skills are insane.

 

A ball hawking safety; not an in-the-box safety.  Great hands, but not overly aggressive given chase and definitely doesn't pop when tackling. He strikes me as corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

If he kills it in the offseason workouts he will be.  Remember, this dude came up just a few yards short of breaking Berry Sanders record.

image.png.1cdd6a3ca40a4761b0dd608fe0d11cf1.png

image.png.65fef559c0f93c16bf4d8a673ef1865d.png

 

He won't be on many draft boards. I have 2 rbs I would take over him and I would not draft either of them higher than late 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking a safety in the top 10?  No way I would do that, unless he is Sean Taylor or Ed Reed which Starks isn’t.  We would be lucky if Carter lasts to #8.  There are the two Georgia edge guys to fall back on if he is gone 

Edited by Shocker
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Taking a safety in the top 10?  No way I would do that, unless he is Sean Taylor or Ed Reed which Starks isn’t.  We would be lucky if Carter lasts to #8.  There are the two Georgia edge guys to fall back on if he is gone 

Has to be generational and Starks is not.  Top 10 you take players that help make (QB, WR, OT) or break (Edge, CB) games.  All other non-STs positions have to be close to, if not generational, for consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

Very possible the top 7 taken are the 2 QBs, Carter, Graham, TMac, Travis Hunter and Will Johnson.

And the phone's not ringing, nobody wants to trade up. So you can't trade down either.

Who you taking then?

 

It's got to be pearce Jr or a Georgia dawg.(both are edges and scary)

Plenty have mocked the combine, but I feel its key for this draft. I think Carter will measure small, even with all the PEDs those guys take. 

 

I think 10 DL will be in the first 22 picks. 

 

*But there are stud OTs still there, some team would trade up for campbell or Simmons. Banks as well, that 8th spot is looking like the best spot for a trade up for a LT. There should be heavy action here, no BS. 

So take the best DLman or best offer for a OT stud. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...