Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everyone Pushing to Draft Yet Another WR Early


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I don't think he comes available at all. We will probably trade for Tyler Lockette or Deebo Samuel 

HELLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOO

Lockett turns 33 a month into the season, there is no circumstance where we should be giving up draft assets for him given that alone, we need guys Bryce can grow with if he's going to be our future at QB, and if not, we need guys who will be around for whoever replaces him.

Deebo is 29, only has 1 year left on his deal and in reality, just isn't a #1 WR (he only has 1 season ove4r 900 yards receiving), he's a gadget guy who can do a lot of things.  Giving up draft picks for that type of player and then needing to give them a new deal as they enter their 30 year old season.

If we were to target a WR through trade this offseason, DK Metcalf would be the player I'd go after in a vacuum.  The real problem with that is DK is basically the player we want XL to turn into, just seems like a poor allocation of resources to go after a similar, albeit much better, style of player.  

I wouldn't be against giving Philly a call about AJ Brown, as they don't exactly have the most harmonious relationship there, but I don't think they move him in the end no matter how next weekend goes.

As I've said numerous times, T-Mac is about our only realistic option for adding a true #1 WR this offseason, if he doesn't fall to us or we don't take him if he does, that's a role/position that won't be filled until next offseason (and no, this isn't another post to say we need to take him, just pointing out the facts that there just likely won't be #1 WRs available to us given our cap/roster abilities this offseason.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a good year to need to spend a 1st on WR considering the generational class last year, imo.

Now if the board shakes out and BPA == WR... well... gotta do what they gotta do.

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frankw said:

Does anyone actually believe Garrett Wilson is available for trade for anything less than a first round pick?

Na.  I would trade a first for him though.  A clear cut young WR1?  Easy trade for me.   I just don't know if they'll trade him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we need defensive playmakers to compete. Edge has to be the pick if Carter or Green there. But we could use a real Split End and TMac is that, not sure XL is capable of winning the matchup consistently on an island or making the consistent catches you need there. XL may be fat Ted Ginn doing Flanker poo- end around, jet sweep, clears, route combo meshes with the slot kind of guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, what it comes down to for me is simple.

True #1 WR's never become FA's, you have to trade for one or draft one.  We haven't had a true #1 since 2013 with Smith, if T-Mac is there, you have to take him.  

There won't be a can't miss elite pass rusher for us there, because there isn't one in the draft, if there was, it's a different discussion, but also they wouldn't make it to 8 anyways.  

Taking T-Mac locks down one of the most important positions in today's game for the next decade, a position we haven't been able to properly fill for 12 years.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Honestly, what it comes down to for me is simple.

True #1 WR's never become FA's, you have to trade for one or draft one.  We haven't had a true #1 since 2013 with Smith, if T-Mac is there, you have to take him.  

There won't be a can't miss elite pass rusher for us there, because there isn't one in the draft, if there was, it's a different discussion, but also they wouldn't make it to 8 anyways.  

Taking T-Mac locks down one of the most important positions in today's game for the next decade, a position we haven't been able to properly fill for 12 years.

T-Mac's lack of separation at the collegiate level does not give you any concern?

He's the biggest body and has good hands, but I don't think he's the best receiver in this draft class. Hunter/Egbuka are my 1a/1b, then Tet, then Golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we can land one more good offensive weapon in FA the offense will likely be more than fine. XL, Sanders, and Coker were all rookies last year. They should project to improve next season. But defensively we are so depleted. We have the worst defensive line in the NFL. Brown needs some help. My personal preference is an Mason Graham or and Edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

We have to go Dline or LB.  We easily win 5 more games last season if we aren't getting gashed for 200 yards on the ground week after week.

No LB to take at 8 (thank god) but after years of Jon Beason, Thomas Davis, and Luke Kuechly it’s apparent that an eraser LB is sorely missing on this team and the biggest need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

HELLLLLLL NOOOOOOOOO

Lockett turns 33 a month into the season, there is no circumstance where we should be giving up draft assets for him given that alone, we need guys Bryce can grow with if he's going to be our future at QB, and if not, we need guys who will be around for whoever replaces him.

Deebo is 29, only has 1 year left on his deal and in reality, just isn't a #1 WR (he only has 1 season ove4r 900 yards receiving), he's a gadget guy who can do a lot of things.  Giving up draft picks for that type of player and then needing to give them a new deal as they enter their 30 year old season.

If we were to target a WR through trade this offseason, DK Metcalf would be the player I'd go after in a vacuum.  The real problem with that is DK is basically the player we want XL to turn into, just seems like a poor allocation of resources to go after a similar, albeit much better, style of player.  

I wouldn't be against giving Philly a call about AJ Brown, as they don't exactly have the most harmonious relationship there, but I don't think they move him in the end no matter how next weekend goes.

As I've said numerous times, T-Mac is about our only realistic option for adding a true #1 WR this offseason, if he doesn't fall to us or we don't take him if he does, that's a role/position that won't be filled until next offseason (and no, this isn't another post to say we need to take him, just pointing out the facts that there just likely won't be #1 WRs available to us given our cap/roster abilities this offseason.

I like McMillan as well, but it's not a surety that he's a WR1 (and there's no surety that he's destined to be the best WR in this class). That being said, at the moment I'd say he'd be a good bet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah it's already a blunder. Do you really think Tep and Co. think so? I hope so, but I'm not as confident in the powers that be's decision making.
    • Where we stand Panthers are 5-4, a record I'd say is right around where the slightly optimstic Panthers fans would have thought they've been, thought having got there a little differently. They have one impressive but ugly win (Packers) and four other wins against bad teams. The Cowboys are not a good team overall, regardless of the trauma response of a lot of posters on here. I don't really consider that an upset. No one predicted that Drake Maye would ascend to the top tier of NFL QBs. The Cardinals loss looks worse and worse, near heroics not withstanding. I have no idea what to make of the Falcons. As far as the Packers, there's something to be said about making a finesse team play ugly.  Overall, I think the Panthers have a middle of the road defense and a bottom third offense that are both overperforming. Reasonable people can disagree,  So where does that leave us for the back half of the season? How does this project for postseason play? I want to look at the Panthers upcoming schedule, the teams in a snapshot, and see how it projects and wax poetically about where that leaves us.  Teams Left on the Schedule New Orleans Saints (1-8) - two games left. the rebuild the saints have been staring down for the better part of the decade has finally arrived. They were sellers at the deadline. Penning isn't a big loss, but they effectively only have one WR now. Barring any substantial developments, the Panthers should be favored in both their games against the Saints. The second game occurs after the Panthers late season bye. But.....it's the Saints. They will Do It for The City. They're also playing hard for first year coach Kellen Moore. Saints have kept the Panthers out of the playoffs twice in the last week of the season (1999, 2002)  Atlanta Falcons (3-5) - Panthers have a game at Atlanta left on their schedule. The falcons are a complete mystery to me. They have Bijan Robinson who's probably the best player on any field. They handled the bills, a team that boat raced Carolina. By all metrics they have a very good defense (shut down Carolina) and there may have been some technical difficulties in Carolina. All that said, there's a lot of whispers the offensive coordinator Zac Robinson is gone after the season, if he even survives it.  San Francisco 49ers (6-3) - Lots of story lines in this one. 49ers are 3rd in a brutal NFC West. No idea if Purdy will be healthy, but Mac Jones is 5-2 as a starter. The 49ers are the better team from a coaching, player, organizational standpoint. They seem to lose a high profile starter for the season every week. Panthers won't be favored in this game. Might be seeing the Panthers starting qb for 2026 in Mac Jones.  Los Angeles Rams (6-2) - In Carolina. Panthers are traveling from the west coast for this after a Monday night game in SF, so they actually have a short week and no travel advantage. Thanks schedulers. Rams are like the 49ers in that they're a better organization in every aspect. I doubt the Panthers will be favored in this game.  Tampa Bay Buccaneers (6-2) - two games left, including the season finale. Like the 49ers and Rams, the Bucs are a better organization top to bottom that the Panthers, and Jason Licht might be the best GM in the sport. They've suffered an incredible number of injuries that they're fighting through just because of how deep a team they are. It's impossible to say exactly what form of the Bucs you're going to see week to week since they're basically rotting and being resurrected on a moment to moment basis. Panthers end the season in Tampa with the Bucs coming off a bye (game against the Dolphins). Panthers played them close last season in Carolina then got blown out in Tampa Bay 2 weeks later. Story lines...hah... Hah!  Seattle Seahawks (6-2) - Sam Darnold revenge game. Let's just be grateful this game isn't happening right now; the Seahawks look dialed in as hell. It's being played in Carolina, and Seattle historically has underperformed on the east coast, but they'll be playing a thursday night game the week before against the Rams so they'll likely practice all week over here. Also, the Panthers play the Bucs the week before this game, so both teams are going to have fuging gone for it. Seahawks will likely be favored. Where does this leave Carolina Seven teams make the playoffs. Glimpsing at the standings, I don't think a wildcard is in play, barring something dramatic. For the Panthers to make the playoffs I think they have to win the South. Absurd optimism: we sweep the Saints, finish off the Falcons, steal one game against the remainder of the NFC West, and split with the Bucs. That puts the Panthers @ 10-7, a huge accomplishment considering the limitations at QB, and a big springboard into 2026, maybe enough to take the South. Alcoholic Pessimism: split with the Saints, lose in Atlanta, get boat raced by the rest of the NFC West, maybe still split against the Bucs because they'd be resting starters in week 18. Finish @ 7-10. An improvement from the year before.  Split the Diff - about where this team was always going to be. 7-8 wins. A couple of gut wrenching losses. A win they had no business of getting. Go into 2026 one draft and a QB away from doing serious damage. 
    • And Jeff George’s teammates hated him. Yeah I mentioned that teammate emotional barometer in a post yesterday I think.  That is something. One hopes they can remember it’s a business and accept change if it comes.  And I hope Morgan and Canales and Tepper all of them don’t overestimate that if he doesn’t pick it up because feeling is not a good enough reason in my book when you talk big money extension. 
×
×
  • Create New...