Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I need some Love


 Share

Recommended Posts

There's no fix. There's never been a fix.

No conspiracy of more than three people ever remains undiscovered.

It is much, much more likely that an entity like the NFL does market research and happily taps into new streams of revenue as they appear. 

And the NFL isn't going to risk $20 billion in revenue because they want to fix games just to have some disgruntled referee or third-string special teamer write the tell-all book on how they rigged the Super Bowl.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

There's no fix. There's never been a fix.

No conspiracy of more than three people ever remains undiscovered.

It is much, much more likely that an entity like the NFL does market research and happily taps into new streams of revenue as they appear. 

And the NFL isn't going to risk $20 billion in revenue because they want to fix games just to have some disgruntled referee or third-string special teamer write the tell-all book on how they rigged the Super Bowl.

 

That is the problem with grand conspiracies. They require a level of secrecy that isn't realistic.

The truth is, I think it's more human than conspiracy. The refs/umpires/game officials can be impacted by the scenarios too. I remember one player some years back from an opposing team saying he wasn't at all intimidated by the Cameron Crazies("pimply faced nerds" or something similar). But if you have ever seen the games there, it's pretty obvious more than a few of the officials get intimidated by that crowd/environment and it impacts their judgements, consciously or subconsciously.

Or think about how players can develop reputations with the officials. So guys will get calls against them or for them based on that. Coaches, same thing. 

If you wanted truly impartial officiating in ANY sport, you would have to remove the human beings from those decisions entirely. That alone may not necessarily be better, per se.

How would you ever get a "let them play" atmosphere(typically in the playoffs) from an AI or algorithm? That happens because the officials decide to stay out of the way for the most part and not call every foul/penalty. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to take as much as possible out of the refs hands. Remove the human element as much as possible. Chips in footballs, lasers, replay, more defined rules, officiating by committee by people upstairs with a better view. Nothing is more annoying about football than “the human element” of officiating. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

 

Yes, bit now they aren't trying to hide it.

Lol. WTF are you talking about? They have never for a moment hid their intentions to capitalize on the Taylor Swift bump.

It wasn't painfully obvious the first few games of incessant cut aways and announcers talking about it?

They haven't even remotely disguised their motives about drawing in Swifty eyeballs to boost their ratings and revenue. 

It's infuriating for real football fans because as soon as Kelce is gone, all those eyeballs will be gone. There isn't suddenly going to be fully circular Venn Diagram of Swifities and NFL Fans.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like to brag, but I personally busted open the Professional Wrestling fraud--I called it fake and staged.  Now we know.  You're welcome.

Seriously--yes--if they can show Taylor Swift they will increase their market share--case study?  My wife.  She loves Taylor Swift and watches the Chiefs for that reason.  It is a non-threatening cult, like those who followed the Beatles.

 

On the other hand, if the news that the NFL is not putting "End Racism" on the endline of the endzones because the President is going to attend, they are not supporting racism--they just know that anything that appears to be against the President will be attacked by his followers--even something as obvious as that--so they are, in my opinion, attempting to avoid political discourse at games.  If you think Taylor Swift is part of political discourse, then perhaps you need to adjust your sense of logic and common sense.  She is remarkably successful and she supports humanitarianism.  If that is something your party attacks, then tell me more about your party.

Does that mean the game will be rigged?  Hardly.  We live in a nation where conspiracy theories are gobbled up like Milk Duds in a theater.  It is time we got back to thinking things through and questioning our sources of information.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want a better product? Stop watching non-panthers games. Dont watch the Super Bowl. Nothing can convince me there is not a conspiracy with the refs and Goodell. The refs are why I stopped watching other games 10 years ago. Everyone needs to follow that rule if they want anything to change. Until then, the same bullsh!t will continue.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not wrestling but there is absolutely a finger on the scale that's beyond the human element. Hell look at the SB in 2016. Wasn't the ref wearing a broncos shirt the next day celebrating after those calls on the field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...