Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deebo wants out of SF, and our current odds are high


ncfan
 Share

Deebo wants out of SF and our Odds are pretty high  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. If he could be had for only the 4th we got for Mingo. Do you trade for him?

    • Yes
      41
    • No
      38


Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm glad we didn't do this.

https://www.facebook.com/NFLonCBS/videos/1177156331120032/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

This man looks like somebody's uncle at the cookout six beers deep talking about how he's gonna show these kids how he did it back in the day. LOL

This dude looks washed as fug.

He looks more like a fullback than a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deebo is maybe one of the most overrated players in a long time thanks to one bonkers fantasy season that was very much an anomaly.

He has had over 892 yards receiving only one time in his 6 year career and has only 2 seasons with over 3 TD Receptions (with 7 and 6).

Yes, I know his versatility and ability to take handoffs and reverses adds to what he brings, but even then, he's only had one season with more than 232 yards, and that wasn't really anything super crazy with only 365.

Him getting 8 Rushing TDs in the season she also had 1,400 yards and 6 TDs rushing gave him an absurd fantasy season and I think most fans struggle to separate one crazy fantasy season output (4 years ago) for being a great player in general.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/10/2025 at 3:57 PM, frankw said:

If you're considering trading for a WR who you will then have to pay a boatload to you call up the Jets for Garrett Wilson. Deebo is not worth top money plus top compensation.

I ain't paying Garrett Wilson top money either. He'd get a step below top money at this point.           

Deebo shouldn't be in any conversation based on contract alone. 

I just don't know that having another receiver will bring the desired result, as much as it will muddy the picture as to who's starting. Bryce likes to spread the ball around, which is a good thing in my opinion, but there's only one ball. I mean, I certainly wouldn't cry about another receiver on a value deal, but I don't see it as a priority. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TD alt said:

I ain't paying Garrett Wilson top money either. He'd get a step below top money at this point.           

Deebo shouldn't be in any conversation based on contract alone. 

I just don't know that having another receiver will bring the desired result, as much as it will muddy the picture as to who's starting. Bryce likes to spread the ball around, which is a good thing in my opinion, but there's only one ball. I mean, I certainly wouldn't cry about another receiver on a value deal, but I don't see it as a priority. 

4yr 130 mil 90 guaranteed for Wilson

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/45740901/sources-jets-wr-garrett-wilson-lands-4-year-130m-extension

Edited by jfra78
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TD alt said:

I just don't know that having another receiver will bring the desired result, as much as it will muddy the picture as to who's starting. Bryce likes to spread the ball around, which is a good thing in my opinion, but there's only one ball. I mean, I certainly wouldn't cry about another receiver on a value deal, but I don't see it as a priority. 

This is from 5 months ago. It was one or the other. Trade for one or draft one. We apparently called the Jets about Wilson. We also talked to the Seahawks about Metcalf. Drafting our own guy was the best course of action given the required investment. Regardless now is the time for Bryce Young to produce. We are fourth amongst all teams in cap spending on the OL. Back to back first round picks at WR and multiple young TE draft picks now. Very solid and respectable backfield. New pieces across the defense. The time is now.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

This is from 5 months ago. It was one or the other. Trade for one or draft one. We apparently called the Jets about Wilson. We also talked to the Seahawks about Metcalf. Drafting our own guy was the best course of action given the required investment. Regardless now is the time for Bryce Young to produce. We are fourth amongst all teams in cap spending on the OL. Back to back first round picks at WR and multiple young TE draft picks now. Very solid and respectable backfield. New pieces across the defense. The time is now.

Yep, homegrown is generally the way to go, especially in terms of the cap. I'm hoping---just hoping---that this will be our best receiving corps in a long time. We've certainly invested the draft capital.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/13/2025 at 8:00 PM, tukafan21 said:

Deebo is maybe one of the most overrated players in a long time thanks to one bonkers fantasy season that was very much an anomaly.

He has had over 892 yards receiving only one time in his 6 year career and has only 2 seasons with over 3 TD Receptions (with 7 and 6).

Yes, I know his versatility and ability to take handoffs and reverses adds to what he brings, but even then, he's only had one season with more than 232 yards, and that wasn't really anything super crazy with only 365.

Him getting 8 Rushing TDs in the season she also had 1,400 yards and 6 TDs rushing gave him an absurd fantasy season and I think most fans struggle to separate one crazy fantasy season output (4 years ago) for being a great player in general.

ahhh the year with him and Kupp the year he had his triple crown. Waltz to the ship easily. They both costed me a championship this past year though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...