Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tyler Warren


 Share

Recommended Posts

bro, he does have impressive highlights and coming from pen state....they are turning out athletic freaks shows. 

Just TE is after RB, SS, and C in value terms. I hold it much higher, but the league doesn't. 

They just need every spot and depth. History has shown its best to wait on TE. Like half the league and the elite came from the 3rd 4th round. 

The deal is they need at least 2, cause Dave base is 12personal

I do see a lane in which the Panthers draft a defense stud at 8th and use the 57th on TE. 

I always want to control the middle of the field, TE allow that. I got no clue why the league doesn't pay or value them. If I was GM, Id have two studs at TE and pay whatever top dollar is (14millper LOL) for each. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at #8 for me. He lacks the agility of recent prospects like Bowers, Laporta, and Kincaid. He is a beast, but I don’t think that’s our route with all of our holes. Plus, we have a promising young player already in our TE room. 
 

I’d prefer we sign someone like Austin Hooper to a cheap deal to go along with Sanders and mentor him. Maybe take a shot at someone like Briningstool, Nesbit, Lachey later in the draft. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I would rather take the slow wr if they go offense. I would never ever take a TE in the top 10. Hell I would take an OT before I would take Warren at 8.

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tr3ach said:

I kind of agree, before I saw how much Bowers has changed the future forecast of the Raiders.   That said I still think I agree on not taking a te at 8, but if they take him i won't be outraged. 

I would be pissed. There's no way you do that. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

This team is that deviod of talent we just need to add studs. And if that's a TE in the top 10 so be it. But if it fails that's a fireable offence for a GM 

The team is devoid of talent and so is the top of the draft.  Take the best chip that falls.  It's that simple.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

A lot of people are saying there are 4 blue chip guys in this draft.  Those would be Carter, Graham, Hunter, and.. Warren.  Throw away positional value and he's probably the best player on the board ar 8.  

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Out of the best guys I follow- there's only 2 blue chips; Carter and hunter. 

Graham is short armed DT devalued, played next to a beast/team, he cheat by being a wrestler (pros will not care)

Warren is a white TE and boxes out defenders rather than getting open.

What?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
    • I hate Marchand, but if he became a free agent.....
×
×
  • Create New...