Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jalon Walker Interview


Mills
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man, I admittedly was not on the Jalon Walker hype train but the kid says the right things & seems to have a great head on his shoulders. I can see him blowing teams away in the interview room. 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

We are going to get Walker, Carter, Graham, Johnson, Warren, Williams, or TMac. I dont care any of those guys makes us much better. 

what would be extra spicy is if we trade down 4-5 spots, as long as its still above hotlanta, pick up an extra 2nd, and still get one of those guys. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

We could do so much worse. If he's the guy get Deone in round 2 and the front 7 is improved. Notice I didn't say fixed.

If we do not trade back this is my favorite scenario - best for me would be to trade back, still get those 2, and add Xavier Watts.  Then I am extremely happy no matter how else the draft goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia LB Jalon Walker Combine measurements

As an edge: HT: 6010 (2nd percentile) WT: 243 lbs. (6th percentile) Arm: 32” (5th percentile) Hand: 10 1/4" (79th percentile)

As an off-ball LB HT: 6010 (30th) WT: 243 lbs. (63rd) Arm: 32” (37th) Hand: 10 1/4" (90th)

I wish he tested at the combine, only way he has the chance to play edge is if he is a freak of freak athlete. I hate to be that guy but taking him at 8 would be a total reach, seems like an amazing human being and competitor but we need to draft the best player possible not the gritty Carolina guy.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jb2288 said:

We are going to get Walker, Carter, Graham, Johnson, Warren, Williams, or TMac. I dont care any of those guys makes us much better. 

Makes us better is key here. I don’t know if any of our picks last year definitively made us better. Just get someone that can solve 1 problem and we are making progress. 

then pick someone else in round 2 that will do the same. Then, crazy idea, maybe do the same thing a few more times. I know it sounds like rocket science but sometimes people overthink these things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he Luke Kuechly?  If he's not 59, we shouldn't be taking him in the top 10.  Yes, he seems like an A+ human being but the real question is "Will he be a difference maker in our scheme?"  The answer must be yes to justify the pick.

If we have doubts about his position, we shouldn't pick him.  Sounds like pundits and insiders are a little uncertain, and that doesn't bode well.  We had another outstanding player and A+ human being here with somewhat ambiguous position fit and it just didn't work out with this coordinator and scheme.  I don't want to see the second coming of Jeremy Chinn.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BrianS said:

Is he Luke Kuechly?  If he's not 59, we shouldn't be taking him in the top 10.  Yes, he seems like an A+ human being but the real question is "Will he be a difference maker in our scheme?"  The answer must be yes to justify the pick.

If we have doubts about his position, we shouldn't pick him.  Sounds like pundits and insiders are a little uncertain, and that doesn't bode well.  We had another outstanding player and A+ human being here with somewhat ambiguous position fit and it just didn't work out with this coordinator and scheme.  I don't want to see the second coming of Jeremy Chinn.

If Luke is the comparison, then we are likely doomed.  Players like him come around only once in a while.  

We need a infusion of talent on defense and the first round is only one part of it.  If he turns out be to be a Shaq Thompson, but we also add a Charles Johnson or Mike Rucker and a Mike Minter in later rounds, I will be happy.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...