Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DK Metcalf Requesting Trade


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

horn, we cannot lose him under any circumstance, according to fnz he is wanting to be the highest paid corner allegedly

That’s ridiculous. I’d much rather have DK if that report is true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I am starting to get worried about Horn. Metcalf is only 27.  If I had to choose, I think I would be looking to trade Horn for Metcalf. 

Paying Horn top corner money is completely insane. He has so rarely ever played like that.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Also, not sure if anyone has posted this but Metcalf is requesting a trade to a contender.

We aren't looking at that for a few seasons if we are very lucky.

I posted it but apparently we’re all ignoring that to fantasize about the trade to Carolina happening.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I posted it but apparently we’re all ignoring that to fantasize about the trade to Carolina happening.

Us as a SB contender is very unlikely in the next 5 seasons if we are crushing every offseason between then and now. 

That is such a crazy long way from being anything close to a reality.

At that point, Metcalf is likely on the backside of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the idea of going after DK, but with a caveat that may or may not be popular around here.

If we trade for DK, we should trade away XL

They're basically the same type of player, except DK is really good and XL is really raw.  While you could say XL can learn from DK, they still play the same type of game and having them both would be duplication rather than complimentary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Love the idea of going after DK, but with a caveat that may or may not be popular around here.

If we trade for DK, we should trade away XL

They're basically the same type of player, except DK is really good and XL is really raw.  While you could say XL can learn from DK, they still play the same type of game and having them both would be duplication rather than complimentary.

Do It Episode 3 GIF by Star Wars

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...