Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wow geno smith to the raiders


 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, fanpanther said:

Wonder if this means sam howell is going to get a shot as seahawks starter

If they want to tank, I guess. Again, it would be a strange move for a 2nd year HC.

Thunderrun to number 1 for the Manning kid(maybe the most overrated prospect in my lifetime)?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Seattle only getting a third for Geno makes me hopeful DK wouldn't cost too much for us 

Giving up any picks in a trade for aging players is too much for this team. This team needs an infusion of young rookies and lots of them. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle is doing everything to get away from the old regime and Carroll wants to get it back together. I bet he pulls a less successful Ron in DC.

Either Seattle is trying to make a move or they just didn't care as with all the other moves. Going to be interesting seeing which way but having both teams going so hard to prove they were right in that breakup is hilarious. It's like the backlash of having such hands off owners and so long of stability under one dominant HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Seattle is doing everything to get away from the old regime and Carroll wants to get it back together. I bet he pulls a less successful Ron in DC.

Either Seattle is trying to make a move or they just didn't care as with all the other moves. Going to be interesting seeing which way but having both teams going so hard to prove they were right in that breakup is hilarious. It's like the backlash of having such hands off owners and so long of stability under one dominant HC.

I would actually bet on sneaky Pete being more successful in LV than Seattle being with the moves they are making under their HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I would actually bet on sneaky Pete being more successful in LV than Seattle being with the moves they are making under their HC.

I was comparing him to Ron. Seattle has to change everything if they want to do it their way. Also ownership changed in 2018 so I have no idea what they are doing now vs the distant ownership model they had going for years. Following Carroll up there was always going to be an uphill fight. I don't think he is willing to change after the last few years and now this trade. Dude already proved he could do it, I'm just not seeing enough adaptability so therefore the Ron comparison again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...