Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schultz: Panthers expected to sign S Tre'von Moehrig to 3-year/$51m deal


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, CRA said:

dislike.  defense is built up front.  on the day, we are just overpaying DBs. 

Looking like we'll be drafting for need on the DL. Not sure a desperate Dan Morgan is a good thing.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yes, I personally liked him more than Holland

I've been listening to football heads on YouTube since the season ended and they all agreed that Moerig is better than Holland. HOLLAND is just a bigger name.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Google how the safety position works in a 2-high shell defense. 
Google how important the safety position is in a Vic Fangio (Evero) type defense.

Then 90% of the people in this thread can come back and edit their thoughts.

Except this guy is a box safety who struggles in coverage and outside the box 📦 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

Milton Williams ended up going to the Patriots lol

Screenshot_20250310_141153_YouTube.jpg

They go Williams and Harold Landry. 
 

they sure are going the Vrabel route. Not helping Drake Maye out one bit. Vrabel is going to turn him into Tannehill when he could be Josh Allen. Not everyone can be Brady and make Amendola, Edelnut, and one other dude work. 
 

He’s got to learn that lesson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Google how the safety position works in a 2-high shell defense. 
Google how important the safety position is in a Vic Fangio (Evero) type defense.

Then 90% of the people in this thread can come back and edit their thoughts.

Vic Fangio is known for dropping more in to coverage.  He basically forced the dink and dunk offense of the modern nfl, by focusing on more in shell coverage to stop deep shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...