Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers re-sign CB Michael Jackson


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

feels like Morgan and co showed their hand and I am completely okay with it

Yes.....Adding a pass rusher threw the draft would solidify all these moves. I mean why just stop now and pivot another direction? It makes no sense, we got guys to stop the run now we just gotta get after the qb. Solidfy the line and worry about everything else next. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Drafting a TE in the 1st in an offense that doesn't seem to use TE much in the passing game doesn't make sense.  

Because our TEs suck?  That's a good reason no to use them much in the passing game.  I mean, a 4th rookie all but showed up all our veteran TEs and Sanders is average at best.  Point being, there's a reason we don't use our TEs as weapons in the passing game and I don't think it's because Canales dislikes using TEs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Because our TEs suck?  That's a good reason no to use them much in the passing game.  I mean, a 4th rookie all but showed up all our veteran TEs and Sanders is average at best.  Point being, there's a reason we don't use our TEs as weapons in the passing game and I don't think it's because Canales dislikes using TEs.

Look back at 2023 bucs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Look back at 2023 bucs 

Apparently Cade Otton was an underutilized stud.  As a middling TE he was still the 4th leading receiver on their team that season.  I mean, he wasn't going to have better stats than Godwin and Evans.  Their starting RB had a few more yards out of the backfield than Otton.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Apparently Cade Otten was an underutilized stud.  As a middling TE he was still the 4th leading receiver on their team that season.  I mean, he wasn't going to have better state than Godwin and Evans.

Point is he under utilizes TEs.  If we pick a TE in the first he would have to be our #1 option, that ain't gonna happen with Canales

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Growl said:

maybe but I’m getting some offensive vibes

mike Kaye said recently that he feels it’s a near certainty they take a TE in the draft

doesn’t have to be at 8, but…

I mean the money they are throwing around is probably more indicative of a pass rusher, as well as their seeming lack of interest in any of the big names on what is otherwise a pretty big spending spree 

But it does kind of feel like TE is a real possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Growl said:

I mean the money they are throwing around is probably more indicative of a pass rusher, as well as their seeming lack of interest in any of the big names on what is otherwise a pretty big spending spree 

But it does kind of feel like TE is a real possibility. 

I don't know about in the 1st, but I think they could draft another in the mid rounds. Tremble's contract is short and we still need a 3rd TE on the roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

sure buddy

Lord knows I don't agree with you on everything, but you are spot on about the bust rate for TEs drafted high.  It's simply too high to justify it on a roster that still needs significant defensive help.

I know Warren is a great prospect, but it would be criminal to pass on the Edge talent that will be available at 8 given our needs.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is huge may not be a trap game but this plays a major part in what they want to do. If we can get some pressure on Sam we know what he does with pressure coming hit and heavy. Also we may be able to take the top off their defense a backup safety trying to stop TMac or Cooker over the top or forcing him to play the backend should allow us to run the ball somewhat effectively. Either they allow some runs or we take some shots and if Bryce and whoever can connect deep we’ll be in business for another big time win against a top notch opponent. Might not be a trap game but health travel game plans all play a major role in each weeks game plan and this week might be leaving our way. We’re missing some replaceable pieces they’re missing key anchors to the offense and defense major difference time to solidly ourselves at one of the top teams in the nfc tomorrow fellas buckle up.
    • Yes.  If I am not mistaken, we need to sign Coker to the ERFA tender and insist that XL spends his spring and summer at a WR camp and not Coon huntin on his four wheeler.  XL was raw when we picked him--which is why I wanted to go another direction--and we are seeing how raw.  He is basically learning a position.     The Panthers will make their move in 2026 to be an NFL powerhouse behind Bryce.  Bryce needs intelligent WRs who catch the ball.  That said, we need a solid #2 to challenge XL and make cutting him easy, if necessary.  A #2 WR (intented to be a #1 by now) with under 400 yards is embarrassing.   On offense, you have to ask, "Where can we get better?"  In my view, #2 WR, TE (although they are improving) and maybe C (again, if we re-sign Mays, he is trending up and at 26, entering his prime--I say stay with him and find competition later in the draft (not good for C).  OL depth maybe?  In other words, XL is a glaring weak spot.    
×
×
  • Create New...