Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers will trade for a WR...

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Veteran pick up doesn't make a difference if he sucks.

Not every guy that's let go is out of a job because he sucks.

Sometimes it's a new system, sometimes it's injury issues, sometimes it's just a roster crunch.

The Panthers have been on both the good and the bad sides of that equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

Steve Smith will have another solid year. Yes he is in the process of losing a step. I think the #2 WR slot will be by committee. One week you might see Jarrett, next you might see LaFell...etc

But as for trading for a WR? I just don't think we've got the ammo to really go out and get a top flight guy. Who has got the goods to give up a stud RB in his prime like D-Will? Better yet, who has a surplus of talented WR's and needs a RB?

...Would you take Roy Williams off the Cowboys hands if the price was right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

...Would you take Roy Williams off the Cowboys hands if the price was right?

I've thought that one over a time or two.

If I thought he could get back to what he once was, probably.

It's not completely out of the realm of possibility to think that he might get released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bigjohn Proficient

bigjohn

Posted
Posted

Anywho, Sutton for a WR equivalent of Sutton would be worth it IMO.

I really really like Sutton's game. I liked it last year in camp and preseason, and I like it now. I think he could be a really good #2 back for another team. If we could get a legit #3 receiver for him, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I think a legit #3 receiver is better than anyone we have not named Smith right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
R0CKnR0LLA Mentor

R0CKnR0LLA

Posted
Posted

I'd like to see us makes some moves but I think the FO is stuck on a "let's work with what we got" type of mentality. There were numerous FA WRs we could have gone after that we didn't even attempt to bring in. Now we're going to trade for a guy? Just don't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

I really hate to say this but TBH I'd rather keep sutton and trade one of our star RBs for s Star WR. Sutton is almost a replica of Dwill, both 5'8, 215 ish, except younger. He is an awesome prospect and I like the way he looks enough to give dwill up for a star wr. Sutton would look good with jstew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I've thought that one over a time or two.

If I thought he could get back to what he once was, probably.

It's not completely out of the realm of possibility to think that he might get released.

Roy and Marshall would be interesting in practice going at it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...