Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MrBubba said:

 

 

Yet before Jeanty, three tackles in top ten?  

So he's thinking/hearing that T-Mac could go before Jeanty, who is all but assured to go in the Top 10, but so many here are so sure that he's not worth taking at 8 if he's there when we're up, ya'll be crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

So he's thinking/hearing that T-Mac could go before Jeanty, who is all but assured to go in the Top 10, but so many here are so sure that he's not worth taking at 8 if he's there when we're up, ya'll be crazy.

Soft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

So he's thinking/hearing that T-Mac could go before Jeanty, who is all but assured to go in the Top 10, but so many here are so sure that he's not worth taking at 8 if he's there when we're up, ya'll be crazy.

Or the Browns are gonna make Hunter a WR 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah that's kind of where I was going.  Our board may be 1A Walker 1B Mykel ahead of Graham.  Don't think it's necessarily a good thing, but he could slip to SF.  

And not to mention, we have a lot invested in the group of Brown, Robinson, Wharton & Brown II for our 3 DL spots.  Not that those guys should be predicating a draft move (they're not world beaters).  

Really think they're weighing LB on our board.  

Don't get me wrong, the guy is talented. But like you said we just signed a bunch a DTs so they probably don't see it as a huge need now. And if it's true walker might go before 8 then Graham might be the safest option. Williams injuries worry me a lil bit, not gonna lie. I just hope what we saw from graham translates to the pros. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

So he's thinking/hearing that T-Mac could go before Jeanty, who is all but assured to go in the Top 10, but so many here are so sure that he's not worth taking at 8 if he's there when we're up, ya'll be crazy.

This is looking like more specifically a jaguars thing. They want to get Lawrence more help and don't need a running back. Some teams don't even have tet top 15-20

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We drafted a qb a year before a bumper qb class so i would not be surprised to see us draft a wr (tet) a year after a bumper wr class (Harrison jr., Nabers, Odunze, Brian Thomas jr., xavier worthy, ricky pearsall, and XL (all first rounders). Just keep using those first round picks and we may get one in a year or two.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Or the Browns are gonna make Hunter a WR 

I'm guessing you didn't watch the clip as he specifically said he's hearing T-Mac could be taken before Jeanty.  

I just assumed the question was meant to disregard Hunter, as he's not falling outside the Top 3 anyways, so if he was included, it would be a dumb question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Panthro said:

There’s a fear Walker might not be there. They really like Nolen though surprised if they take him over Walker

If they trade down he’s their target

 if they do the Cowboys 12/44 watch them go Nolen and then that UCLA Lber Scheswinger

very interesting.....very. thanks for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm guessing you didn't watch the clip as he specifically said he's hearing T-Mac could be taken before Jeanty.  

I just assumed the question was meant to disregard Hunter, as he's not falling outside the Top 3 anyways, so if he was included, it would be a dumb question.

Rap later clarified that Hunter was in his own special category

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...