Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Prospects of interest going into day three


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We need a safety, corner, WR and RB with four of the five picks.   The luxury pick will be either a TE, DL, OL or ILB.

No no no. Stick to the board! Draft BPA! That's what the top tier teams do.

FA (and to a much lesser extent, UDFA) is for all the needs stuff. 

Edited by TD alt
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Some good value at CB, DT and RB.

Bowman is the only remaining safety that I feel is a good with w/Moehrig

Maybe Strong, Tuten, Peebles - the triple hokie haha

Peebles is off my hokie list. I want Lane, tuten (my fav of the bunch), and ok with strong.

Strong is a hit or miss: you put him in zone and he's going to look great. Ask him to cover outside and he's going to give up huge plays down field. He's great when he has help over the top, but doesn't have the recovery speed unfortunately. But damn if he's facing the QB, he's money. I wouldn't want him on speedy slots though. He is a willing tackler too. Comes up and can support in the run game and blitz too. I am afraid he's not quite the athlete to really standup as a slot guy early and that limits his career. Now could be a ST ace.

 

Lane was underutilized. I don't think his track speed always shows on tape. If he gets a runway sure he's gone. Routes are ok but teachable. As a returner he was very good. Again get him a crease and he can flat fly. Big enough to be a true speedy slot guy in the NFL.

Now tuten, if he was at a blue blood he'd be gone. Great vision and patience as a runner. What shocked was the explosion and speed. He was injured allot at VT so the tape showed the combine numbers only at times. Much improved as a receiver out of the backfield. Getting a lb on him on a wheel route equalled big chunks. Mediocre as a pass blocker but much improved. Kickoff and put return strengths too. My issues are health. Never 100% as the seasons wore on. Historically VT has had good backs, that never translate for long due to health. As a Blackshear replacement his is an upgrade for sure. I don't think he's a 3 down back but gets 20 snaps a game cause i don't trust the health. Now could he spot start and get 50+ snaps and 20+ carries for a stretch sure, but I wouldn't want to rely on him as the #1 guy for a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rags said:

I don't think there's any thing that projects higher than Wallace or Jewell at this point but I like Stutsman a lot here.

Yeah, I think we'll probably end up rolling with Wallace and Jewell, and we probably should. At least we know what Jewell is (solid), and Wallace is still developing. It's way too early to be giving up on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

In no particular order:

Deone Walker - DT Kentucky 

Quincy Riley - CB Louisville 

Jalen Royals - WR Utah State

Billy Bowman Jr - S Oklahoma 

Danny Stutsman - LB Oklahoma 

Andres Borregales - K Miami 

Cam Skattebo - RB Arizona State 

Drew Kendall - C Boston College

 

I like this list.

I would add Chris Paul to it

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually wouldn't mind drafting S. Sanders.  The dude got the message.  The last day of the draft is made for taking shots.  Yes, I know we have Bryce.  What if he regresses?  Using a fourth round pick on a guy some thought was a first round talent isn't dumb.

What if Bryce works out? The honest answer is it's not about Bryce.  Bryce will either work or not, and it's totally in his hands.

What about Sanders?  Maybe Sanders is never more than a backup.  Getting a backup QB in the fourth round is great business.  Maybe he shows the ability to be a starter.  That's a great problem to have!  If you have two starting quality QB's on your roster, you can keep the one you feel fits you the best and flip the other for draft capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Rags said:

I don't think there's any thing that projects higher than Wallace or Jewell at this point but I like Stutsman a lot here.

 I'd rate Chris Paul Jr, Stutsman and Barrett Carter upgrades over Wallace coming out. However, Wallace has more upside than all three. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I actually wouldn't mind drafting S. Sanders.  The dude got the message.  The last day of the draft is made for taking shots.  Yes, I know we have Bryce.  What if he regresses?  Using a fourth round pick on a guy some thought was a first round talent isn't dumb.

What if Bryce works out? The honest answer is it's not about Bryce.  Bryce will either work or not, and it's totally in his hands.

What about Sanders?  Maybe Sanders is never more than a backup.  Getting a backup QB in the fourth round is great business.  Maybe he shows the ability to be a starter.  That's a great problem to have!  If you have two starting quality QB's on your roster, you can keep the one you feel fits you the best and flip the other for draft capital.

I get your point and don't disagree overall, but we still need to fill too many holes. S, LB, CB, OT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, TD alt said:

No Skattebo? Fail!

J/K...somewhat! 🙂

I rather have a rotational DT than a RB that won't see the field.  The RB I picked at 208 ran a 4.29, maybe he can return punts and KR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TD alt said:

No no no. Stick to the board! Draft BPA! That's what the top tier teams do.

FA (and to a much lesser extent, UDFA) is for all the needs stuff. 

Top teams can afford to do that cause they don't have holes like we do.  Also Eagles traded up to get Mukuba, was he BPA?

Edited by jfra78
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
    • Shannon was sued for $50 million (settled out of court, I believe) for forcing sex on his girlfriend during a two-year relationship.  He denies it, but ESPN let him go last April.  Chad Johnson's wife filed a police report because he head-butted her in a car and was put on probation. I had to google it.  I watched the Ray Rice video and when you see it, you realize just how vile and cowardly abusing a woman really is.  But for the same point Aussie tried to make, these women are defenseless, and being phyiscally bigger and stronger does not validate your actions.   I can't even stand to watch Steve Smith.  I can't normalize this kind of behavior--again, I do not think R-P had that in mind when he posted this.  When the reason was exposed, we should realize that we are talking life (quality of) and death (in some cases) here.  
×
×
  • Create New...