Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

Bear Hands

By Bear Hands,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation.

If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection.

If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him.

Unfortunately, none of the above were true

1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player.

2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024.

3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024.

Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024

2021 TMJ

2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick.

2023 Jonathan Mingo

2024 Jonathon Brooks.

We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 

Every team does it's homework. More so than any fan. 

Brooks, had he not been injured, would have been a first round talent. 

I have zero problems with the team (Dan Morgan and company) drafting Brooks in the 2nd.  He is a fantastic talent. 

As far as risk, this is the NFL.  Any and every player is exposed to the same brutality that the NFL is. 

Despite Brooks latest setback, it doesn't cost the team much.  Our running back room is stacked.  Could they have drafted someone else? Sure. No promise that someone else would have made an impact last year.  Or this year.  

When it's your job to do what Dan does, I pray you get it all right. Lord knows that there isn't a single GM that gets it all right. 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation.

If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection.

If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him.

Unfortunately, none of the above were true

1)  We were a terrible team in 2024 and needed an immediate impact player.

2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024.

3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024.

Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024

2021 TMJ

2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick.

2023 Jonathan Mingo

2024 Jonathon Brooks.

We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 

I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there:

  • There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders.
  • The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young.
  • Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November.
  • Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall.
  • The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them.

So if we're framing things with that context:

  • Chuba was expected to be RB1
  • Miles (at the time) was RB2
  • Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway.

The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).

 

NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
countryboi Veteran

countryboi

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Yes, if the position he played was "walking back" things wouldn't seem so bleak.

You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.

Edited by countryboi
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Icege said:

NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.

I understand the reasoning, but it was a very risky move and hindsight proves that. We were 2-15 in 2023. We needed help at almost every position on the team.

When a team is bad, you can't afford to miss out on your Day 1 and Day 2 draft choices. "IF" I were a GM in our 2024 draft situation, I'm not investing a 2nd round pick on a RB coming off of an ACL tear in NOVEMBER unless  I know I don't have to use him his rookie season. As has been pointed out, it's not uncommon for a setback to occur w/in a year of the initial surgery. If I had to have a starting back I would have taken the safest/surest draft choice at a position of need in  round 2 and then taken the best available back in round 3 or round 4.

In 2025 I would put him on the field along with the 2024 2nd rounder who should be starting at another position on the field.

Edited by SCO96
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
Just now, SCO96 said:

I understand the reasoning, but it was a very risky move and hindsight proves that. We were 2-15 in 2023. We needed help at almost every position on the team.

When a team is bad, you can't afford to miss out on your Day 1 and Day 2 draft choices. "IF" I were a GM in our 2024 draft situation, I'm not investing a 2nd round pick on a RB coming off of an ACL tear in NOVEMBER unless  I know I don't have to use him his rookie season. As has been pointed out, it's not uncommon for a setback to occur w/in a year of the initial surgery. If I had to have a starting back I would have taken the safest choice and round 2 and then took the best available back in round 3 or round 4.

In 2025 I would put him on the field along with the 2024 2nd rounder who should be starting at another position on the field.

Agreed.  And just thinking about the other side of the RB coin.  When has a team regretted passing on a RB?  Can you think of an example of a team passing on a RB and regretting it big time later?  I can't think of any in the last 20 years.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icege Grand Master

Icege

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, CanadianCat said:

If BY continues to develop. 

XL learns how to catch with his speed.

Tet lives up to his hype...

THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm

Don't forget the young TEs, Coker, Etienne, and Jimmy Horn Jr! 😮

I'm amped to see how the team develops over the course of this upcoming season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Icege said:

I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there:

  • There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders.
  • The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young.
  • Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November.
  • Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall.
  • The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them.

So if we're framing things with that context:

  • Chuba was expected to be RB1
  • Miles (at the time) was RB2
  • Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway.

The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).

 

NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.

43d7acf2-8541-4588-856a-0fef5ab9fb51_text.gif.134046f5f74cfaba9e854ea6e23e2535.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadCat Grand Master

OneBadCat

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don’t have any negativity towards Brooks being on the roster. He was the best RB in his draft class and flashed his talent at the NFL level.

Sometimes you have to gamble and take chance on a guy. Our RB room is solid. Brooks has the talent to be an elite back. He brings a different dynamic to Hubbard.
 

Some might consider him a luxury selection. But with the way Bryce plays and the way he can move the chains, he can dramatically increase the effectiveness of a guy like Brooks. At the end of the day if it doesn’t work out , it doesn’t work out. But he at least looks like he can play and belongs. He’s a much better pick than Mingo and TMJ was. 

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WhoKnows Grand Master

WhoKnows

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 5/10/2025 at 9:34 PM, OneBadCat said:

 

I don’t have any negativity towards Brooks being on the roster. He was the best RB in his draft class and flashed his talent at the NFL level.

 

Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025.

We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle.

Also, “flashed his talent” isn’t 9 carries for 22 yards. His one reception for 18 yards isn’t a flash with 11 other touches for 27 yards. He hasn’t proven anything. We have no idea if he’ll contribute in 2026.

Edited by WhoKnows
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)

Doubling tripling and quadrupling down on this subject in defense of the pick is reminiscent of a certain mindset that has overtaken the political world.

This conversation will become less contentious and dragged out to the point of becoming a dead beaten horse if rational minds can simply agree that we made a mistake missed on a potential franchise center and we will learn from it. All this coping is unnecessary.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      Brooks RB, Placed on PUP, Out for 2025

      By Icege · Posted

      Considering you previously struggled to understand BTT despite it being explained in a video, write-up, and multiple replies, I get why this might be a little too complex for you. Happy to clarify again! Just let me know which part tripped you up this time. 😉
    • Khyber53
      a look at our 19 udfas

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      And, honestly, there's only so much you can attempt to do in the draft. And every draft pick is a roll of the dice. But that's where grabbing a ton of UDFAs, and targeting the best, makes a big difference. Sure, their individual chances of getting a hit here is less, but that shotgun pattern might just hit something.  Right now, we need bulk, partly to rebuild and partly to dilute the deep level of stank that has developed on this team in the last six years. If we're going to rebuild a culture built around culture, accountability and winning, then these UDFAs we bring in each season have to be the wash water that gets out that leftover dirt.  Canales seems to be a smart, culture-first, build up the good ones kind of guy. I like that and I hope he can keep it going here. But he was working against a locker room that had been taught to lose and taught to distrust or ignore coaches. He's got his work cut out for him, still. He does seem to have it moving in the right direction and that's something I was pretty amazed with by the end of last season.  
    • shaqattaq
      Strength of Schedule for 2025

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      The most telling sign, IMO, of a team on the upward swing is who we lost in the off-season. Who left that even saw the field? Woods, Clowney, Sanders, & Hekker. OK...no big deal. Clowney is the only 1 that I raised an eyebrow over and I get that it was a money decision. No need to pay him over $7M to take snaps from our draft picks when he was just OK last year.
×
×
  • Create New...