Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers decision to pass on Walker


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

 

https://catcrave.com/insider-drops-bombshell-panthers-decision-snub-jalon-walker

 

I remember this being discussed by several here in the pre-draft run up. Evero had no use for Chinn, so how did Walker truly make any sense?

No issue with passing on Walker/how our draft went, but what does Everos use of Chinn have to do with projecting how he might have used Walker? Beyond being called a “tweeter” by some, totally different players and roles on the field. 
 

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Coheed said:

No issue with passing on Walker/how our draft went, but what does Everos use of Chinn have to do with projecting how he might have used Walker? Beyond being called a “tweeter” by some, totally different players and roles on the field. 
 

I don't think it has anything to do with Chinn. I mean, Chinn was a LB/safety tweener where Walker is am EDGE/LB tweener. Really different players and how we used Chinn was really kinda forced on us by our roster. He wasn't good in a deep safety role but he was the best option we had. Now I would argue that we should've still used Chinn where he was most effective but that's just me. I don't see how you're making a D better by misusing one of your better talents.

It does seem like the Raiders are finally starting to use him how he should be used if you're going to play him at safety.

Screenshot_20250509-120024.thumb.png.3fcf1a3154392899690091602ae08b7b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

 

https://catcrave.com/insider-drops-bombshell-panthers-decision-snub-jalon-walker

 

I remember this being discussed by several here in the pre-draft run up. Evero had no use for Chinn, so how did Walker truly make any sense?

this aint just an Evero problem either the NFL favors guys with an position. Walker need a vision and a plan and he wasnt going to get that here

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think it has anything to do with Chinn. I mean, Chinn was a LB/safety tweener where Walker is am EDGE/LB tweener. Really different players and how we used Chinn was really kinda forced on us by our roster. He wasn't good in a deep safety role but he was the best option we had. Now I would argue that we should've still used Chinn where he was most effective but that's just me. I don't see how you're making a D better by misusing one of your better talents.

It does seem like the Raiders are finally starting to use him how he should be used if you're going to play him at safety.

Screenshot_20250509-120024.thumb.png.3fcf1a3154392899690091602ae08b7b.png

we picked up two in box, run defense specialists at safety this offseason in both Ransom and Moerhig but Evero never bothered to play Chinn in that role

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

we picked up two in box, run defense specialists at safety this offseason in both Ransom and Moerhig but Evero never bothered to play Chinn in that role

I've been warning folks to prepare for Moehrig to be misused as a primarily deep safety this year precisely because of this.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coheed said:

No issue with passing on Walker/how our draft went, but what does Everos use of Chinn have to do with projecting how he might have used Walker? Beyond being called a “tweeter” by some, totally different players and roles on the field. 
 

Basically a reflection of Evero's general inflexibility about square pegs in his defense.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brandt's comment about Wharton was from his KC perspective when Wharton was a UDFA rookie.   "it goes back to the anecdote that Brandt Tillis had when he was in Kansas City. And it would be so easy to just cut Turk Wharton in 2020 when he was an undrafted rookie from a division two college in Missouri. It would been so easy to cut him because then he would have cleared waivers easily. No one knew this guy. They didn't have any joint practices, didn't have a preseason. Would have been so easy to cut him and bring him back on the practice squad and let him continue to build from there. And Brandt essentially said, "No, he's got to make the 53man roster if we're going to have any sort sense of credibility with this team."    
    • Plenty of us were scratching our heads about that signing at the time. Especially with our 3-4 defense. Wharton is kind of a one trick pony situational five tech DT. He doesn't have the beef to hold up against the run and he doesn't have the juice to shift outside. He's basically a situational pass rusher DT. If we paid him $40M+ and he can't start for a historically inept defense then holy poo...
    • Agreed.  300 and 2 or 3 total in Jacksonville in a winning effort would sure be a nice start.
×
×
  • Create New...