Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKiNG NEWS: Panthers interested in trading for Trey Hendrickson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

Like we did with the CMC trade

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

And Burns wasn’t Parsons. Shows again how dumb we were.

Not even close!!! BURNS was a one trick pony who had a big game or two a year in the sack collum and was invinsible the rest of the time....

 

Heck hes gonna be the Giants fourth best rusher this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Remember that Khalil Mack was traded for 2 firsts and some change at the end of his rookie deal to the Bears.

The Bears ultimately won the trade as Mack was a continuous PB/AP player and the Raiders squandered all the draft capital on players worth far less. 

It's dumb to turn down that kind of haul, but it's definitely not hard to completely squander.

 

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

 

I think Parsons is great, but unless we are one player away from being a SB contender, i avoid that deal like the plague.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The Bears may have won the trade, but neither team has much to show for it. 

Yeah everybody was so concerned about who would win the trade years down the line.  But what if nobody does, and the only people who remember the trade are Panthers fans, Bears fans, and NFL trivia buffs?  That's most trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...