Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN and Cam Newton


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

I sort of hate to see him jump onto the painfully bad and sinking First Take show.  People basically hate watch these show for bad takes at this point.    

I agree, I don't think it's a very good place to hitch your wagon.  However, Cam does have some cringe-worthy takes at times so he will probably fit right in.

I would much prefer he follow in the footsteps of Nate Burleson or his teammate Greg Olsen than chase the Steven A's of the world.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I agree, I don't think it's a very good place to hitch your wagon.  However, Cam does have some cringe-worthy takes at times so he will probably fit right in.

I would much prefer he follow in the footsteps of Nate Burleson or his teammate Greg Olsen than chase the Steven A's of the world.

worst part of the show is Stephen A.   They should just get a moderator to play the role as such (not Molly) to keep some former athletes on task as they debate set topics.  That's ultimately why the podcast stuff works.  The Stephen A, Skip component...which is the worst part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CRA said:

I sort of hate to see him jump onto the painfully bad and sinking First Take show.  People basically hate watch these show for bad takes at this point.    

He’s going to crush though. I know people hate on it but Cam the enigma just attracts eyeballs. We know all about that. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CRA said:

worst part of the show is Stephen A.   They should just get a moderator to play the role as such (not Molly) to keep some former athletes on task as they debate set topics.  That's ultimately why the podcast stuff works.  The Stephen A, Skip component...which is the worst part. 

ESPN has a whole is just hot takes and the dumbest takes possible. That is why it sucks so badly. They intentionally drag everything down to a lightspeed retarded level so that it is unwatchable.

No jounalism, no nuance, no in depth analysis....just idiot after idiot blabbering/shouting about some hot button issue that they really have no real strong opinions about until the camera is rolling.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

ESPN has a whole is just hot takes and the dumbest takes possible. That is why it sucks so badly. They intentionally drag everything down to a lightspeed retarded level so that it is unwatchable.

No jounalism, no nuance, no in depth analysis....just idiot after idiot blabbering/shouting about some hot button issue that they really have no real strong opinions about until the camera is rolling.

They have essentially turned it into the View. I was over my mother's house doing some yardwork and had went in to get water. I hear these women shouting over each other, unable to make points due to interruptions by cohost, thus seeming incoherent, and in the end just coming off as next level annoying. It was the View. At some point ESPN execs looked at that format and were like you know what might work!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...