Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Parsons to Green Bay


Recommended Posts

On 8/29/2025 at 6:36 PM, fanpanther said:

Knee jerk reaction is gb got a great player but in actuality i have rarely if at all ever seen a trade like this work for the team giving up the pics.  Seems theres all this hype then alot of time players get these huge contracts and let their foot off thr gas and coast...khalil mak is a recent one as well as of course watson

I think that overall big trades just don't work out for either team just because it's so hard to win in this league. Mack trade didn't work out for either organization honestly but even if the Raiders hadn't traded him they almost certainly don't win a superbowl with him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2025 at 6:00 PM, PleaseCutStewart said:

And to think we could have traded burns, a pass rusher much worse than Parsons, for almost the same as Parsons...

God we blew that chance 

this is the real travesty in all of this. how you don't trade burns for that is asinine but then not to immediately extend him that moment is even more diabolical  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SOJA said:

this is the real travesty in all of this. how you don't trade burns for that is asinine but then not to immediately extend him that moment is even more diabolical  

 

If you bump that long BB trade thread, I said "if you turn down two 1st even future ones and other picks, you 100% have to sign him long term". *But now the burns camp has more Leverage in contract talks, still you have to pony up.

BB whatever people think(I didn't have a good opinion) was very young and talented. The team needing young talent the most is the Panthers. Getting that 2nd and turning it into a RB that's going to miss 32 out of 34 games, just shoot both hands while you are at Danny boy......Again the panther lack young talent and they took a high valued stock and sat on it until it tanked and then used the remains to another loser stock chips....... Wow that's how to suck 101.....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

If you bump that long BB trade thread, I said "if you turn down two 1st even future ones and other picks, you 100% have to sign him long term". *But now the burns camp has more Leverage in contract talks, still you have to pony up.

BB whatever people think(I didn't have a good opinion) was very young and talented. The team needing young talent the most is the Panthers. Getting that 2nd and turning it into a RB that's going to miss 32 out of 34 games, just shoot both hands while you are at Danny boy......Again the panther lack young talent and they took a high valued stock and sat on it until it tanked and then used the remains to another loser stock chips....... Wow that's how to suck 101.....

exactly good call on your part 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Camp Fodder said:

I’m seeing articles indicating we called about Parsons but backed out when they wanted DBrown. I am guessing the price was D Brown and 2 firsts 

I wouldn't have had a problem with giving up Brown for Parsons but we literally can't afford the 2 firsts. That's future roster suicide.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I wouldn't have had a problem with giving up Brown for Parsons but we literally can't afford the 2 firsts. That's future roster suicide.

Dallas is so dumb. If I was Dallas I would’ve taken Ashawn Robinson or Wharton or hell even Bobby Brown instead of Brown if it meant securing our 2 1st rounders 

Kenny Clark is about to turn 30 and isn’t anything special but those 1st rounders from GB are most likely going to be in the 20’s

Our picks could end up ranging from like 5-18

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Dallas is so dumb. If I was Dallas I would’ve taken Ashawn Robinson or Wharton or hell even Bobby Brown instead of Brown if it meant securing our 2 1st rounders 

Kenny Clark is about to turn 30 and isn’t anything special but those 1st rounders from GB are most likely going to be in the 20’s

Our picks could end up ranging from like 5-18

Who said we offered 2 1st rounders or anything 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parsons to Carolina made no sense if we were going to try and give him what he wanted. If it was 2 1sts,  DB, and that contract, there was no feasible was to build around him in the next 4 years, especially with Bryce still lacking a full season of productivity. GB has their QB. We aren't certain yet, though the end of last season was reason for optimism. Parsons is an elite talent, but unfortunately we're not in the position to make that type of move for him. That's a put you over the top SB window run type move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s not new. That particular claim has largely disappeared because it has become untenable, but a few games into his rookie year when the playbook/gameplan/personnel/everything was terrible there was endless claims, posts, even threads made that Bryce Young was physically incapable of throwing the ball 20 yards downfield in the NFL. It was also argued that physically throwing the ball 20 yards in the NFL was somehow different than college. Once he threw the ball 20 yards, the goal posts moved to 30 yards, etc. I’m not going to use the search function for you, the point wasn’t as much that one claim as it was that that was one claim out of many that has made it very difficult to have a reasonable discussion here.
    • I mean, I can get a ball downfield 40 yards.  There would be a couple massive issues with me doing it.   My ball placement would be off the charts bad.  Second, for me to get it 40 yards I'm gonna have to moon it......which would give DBs the opportunity to make plays on balls that wouldn't exist if a better QB were throwing it.  Which is all an exaggerated explanation of the Bryce issue.  To many play the literal game w/ Bryce when it comes defending him.  Every NFL QB likely can loft one up around 50 yards.  Every QB in the NFL can't get a ball 30 yards downfield in the same windows.  Or the same ball placement.  That's the Bryce issue.    But I also think mixed into that is just his QB DNA.    Take a young Brees, it was in his DNA to stress defenses and takes shots.  He would flat out be Delhomme-ish at times.  Which is coverage and assignment altering.  Brees would throw balls into triple coverage 40 yards downfield.  Is that smart? Sometimes it is.  Not because the play gets made but you force the secondary to play honest.  
    • Tbf were not going to the superbowl this year so the development of our young wr is invaluable  As a side note 5 of our wr are in their 2nd year or less ( t Mac, Coker, tremayne, horn, x)  It's def a promising youth movement
×
×
  • Create New...