Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MNF predictions


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, AggieLean said:

39-13 49ers win.

We score a garbage time TD, but this game is over at the half. 

I don't think 49ers don't have a 39 point offense.

The 41 they scored against the Cardinals was a aberration rather than the norm.

They were aided by a kick return td, 3 turnovers, and 17 Cardinal penalties.

Efficient offense but their passing game is predicated on the tightend and finding Christian Mccaffrey out of the backfield, of their 20 passing tds this season only 3 were accredited to wide receivers.  

Granted covering TE's and RB's has been a struggle for our linebacker crew, but if they can employ a similar strategy with Horn on Kittle ala Kyle Pitts the 49ers don't have a Drake London who can kill us. 

Defensively both defenses are ineffective at rushing the passer, Bryce just faced the #2 sack defense so facing the 49ers who are dead last in the league should be a relief.

The 49ers are near the bottom as far as allowing production to WR's that typically means weak secondary, so I don't think they can afford to mug the line of scrimmage ala the Saints and Falcons they have to employ a shell zone which could open up the door for Rico and the run game, unless they doubt and test whether Bryce can have a repeat performance.

Should be a good match up, both teams should be able to move the ball, turnovers and execution in the Redzone will decide it.

I think the Panthers take it if they can ride the momentum of last games passing attack. 

 

 

 

.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pantherxtreme said:

I don't think 49ers don't have a 39 point offense.

The 41 they scored against the Cardinals was a aberration rather than the norm.

They were aided by a kick return td, 3 turnovers, and 17 Cardinal penalties.

Efficient offense but their passing game is predicated on the tightend and finding Christian Mccaffrey out of the backfield, of their 20 passing tds this season only 3 were accredited to wide receivers.  

Granted covering TE's and RB's has been a struggle for our linebacker crew, but if they can employ a similar strategy with Horn on Kittle ala Kyle Pitts the 49ers don't have a Drake London who can kill us. 

Defensively both defenses are ineffective at rushing the passer, Bryce just faced the #2 sack defense so facing the 49ers who are dead last in the league should be a relief.

The 49ers are near the bottom as far as allowing production to WR's that typically means weak secondary, so I don't think they can afford to mug the line of scrimmage ala the Saints and Falcons they have to employ a shell zone which could open up the door for Rico and the run game, unless they doubt and test whether Bryce can have a repeat performance.

Should be a good match up, both teams should be able to move the ball, turnovers and execution in the Redzone will decide it.

I think the Panthers take it if they can ride the momentum of last games passing attack. 

 

 

 

.

 

They got the #2 pass offense in the NFL and could jump to #1 any given Sunday at this point.   They are playing at home.   There passing strength also syncs up with our weakness on pass defense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, CRA said:

They got the #2 pass offense in the NFL and could jump to #1 any given Sunday at this point.   They are playing at home.   There passing strength also syncs up with our weakness on pass defense.  

Those passing yards were accumulated with Mac Jones at Qb for what it's worth. 

The last two road games at Green Bay and Atlanta we've faired well.

Their passing strength does line up with our weakness.

They were already dealing with injuries on defense and now the backup MLB who was filling in for Fred Warner suffered a high ankle sprain against the Cardinals so they will be down to their 3rd string MLB so a defense already struggling will have to deal with replacing another starter. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Pantherxtreme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49ers 38

Panthers 10

 

I have a significant amount of hatred for the 49ers but they are immensely more talented(even though they are banged up), the gulf between the coaching staff quality is one of the largest imaginable and they will be at home.

I think this is just one of those bad matchups for us. If we can't ball control early and force TO's, this is gonna get out of hand quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2025 at 7:17 PM, Jon Snow said:

McCaffrey may set a single game rushing record. 

Or receiving

the panthers offense and special teams have to perform    

those linebackers replacing the 2 that is out also play special teams 

49ers are vulnerable defensively too

gotta say that  having Corbett and Zavala on the line is concerning   

i really want tgem to won this game 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/17/2025 at 12:18 PM, Burnout189 said:

History indicates we typically poo the bed in prime time games.

I was going to say this. Don't expect anything like the Falcons game last Sunday.

I don't think we'll have answers defensively for Kittle and McCaffrey. Among others. Missing your two starting ILBs and your starting Center is an absolute killer.

The only thing we have going for us is pure luck that injuries and free agency have decimated the 49ers defense recently. If they had their Super Bowl defense with Warner, Greenlaw, Bosa, and the secondary guys they lost.  Then this would have been a massacre. 

Maybe we have a slight chance if we can somehow get the pass rush going and stop cmc from murdering us.

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...