Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you swap keeping Burns for Horn?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burns quit on his team, full stop. Burns was and continues to be a liability in the run. 
 

JC has never looked this bad before the concussion. He always was a very solid tackler, from what I remember.  I’ll take the overall body of his work over his current down stretch. I’ve never had to question his heart. The FO has royally screwed up roster management in many other deals but retaining Horn continues to be the right move. He will be back to form next season. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, hepcat said:

Title says it all, if you could get swap Jaycee Horn for Brian Burns would you do it?

You should never make a strength weaker, just to make a weakness not as weak.

When we had Burns and Jaycee was hurt, teams would just run 3 step drops or run directly at BB.

With Jaycee staying healthier we get 5 Ints and a few coverage sacks along the way.  Jaycee also has been sent on blitzes with success.

It would be nice to have Burns… and CMC… and DJ… but I digress, the answer is no.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Burns quit on his team, full stop. Burns was and continues to be a liability in the run. 
 

JC has never looked this bad before the concussion. He always was a very solid tackler, from what I remember.  I’ll take the overall body of his work over his current down stretch. I’ve never had to question his heart. The FO has royally screwed up roster management in many other deals but retaining Horn continues to be the right move. He will be back to form next season. 

Burns did kind of quit on us. I forgot about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd probably say yes - primarily because when Burns messed up he just overran the QB again - he missed making a game changing play.
Horn - at least the last few games - has really hurt us with penalties, dropped INT, and getting beat regularly when the other team needed a first down or a score.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I laugh when I see the terms “elite”and “Top 5” attached to Horn.. He’s neither.. 

He was a mistake pick. Should have been Parsons.. but if you were hell bent on a CB, Surtain was the guy.

Forget about the awful facemask penalty.. Look at the Saints games.. Mr. 70 million guaranteed got smoked like a ham in both games.. the Game of BoA he was atrocious- penalties and was primary coverage on two TD’s. The game in NO Olive ate his lunch. “Shutdown” CB’s don’t let that happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RevJ said:

I'd probably say yes - primarily because when Burns messed up he just overran the QB again - he missed making a game changing play.
Horn - at least the last few games - has really hurt us with penalties, dropped INT, and getting beat regularly when the other team needed a first down or a score.  

Burns hurt us ample times by loafing and being a nonfactor. You don't have the benefits attributed to having an elite pass rusher when they disappear from games.

Horn has lapses but has had far longer stretches of very good to elite play than Burns ever has.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, trueblue said:

I laugh when I see the terms “elite”and “Top 5” attached to Horn.. He’s neither.. 

He was a mistake pick. Should have been Parsons.. but if you were hell bent on a CB, Surtain was the guy.

Forget about the awful facemask penalty.. Look at the Saints games.. Mr. 70 million guaranteed got smoked like a ham in both games.. the Game of BoA he was atrocious- penalties and was primary coverage on two TD’s. The game in NO Olive ate his lunch. “Shutdown” CB’s don’t let that happen. 

If you look at a lot of their career statistics, Horn isn't far behind Surtain. I think Surtain is a far more sure tackler and is beaten badly a lot less often. Horn produces more INT's but also get beat pretty badly more frequently. 

Surtain fits the "shutdown" mold. In this defense Horn is a little bit more of a gambling/Josh Norman type CB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...