Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So why was Canales hired again?


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

The first game of the season against the Jaguars and thier new rookie HC starting his first game and Canales was outcoached. Against the Saints and their new rookie head coach he was outcoached - twice. 

Watching the last several games with the questionable play calling, to say nothing of the lack of any consistancy in any area, I'm starting to wonder if he is up to the task.

Looking over his record with TB and Mayfield is interesting.

Here are Mayfields numbers with Canales verses Coen. The highlighted row is with Canales. As you can see, Mayfiled improved significantly in every catagory AFTER Canales left: yardage was up by 500, comp % was up 7%, TD's were up by 13 etc.

Then when you look at TBs' rushing numbers that year under Canales, it gets even worse as Tampa was dead last in rushing with Canales.

DEAD LAST

There is no doubt the Panthers have improved but I'm begining to wonder if Canales has hit his ceiling already.

 

Screenshot 2026-01-04 at 12.35.07 AM.png

Screenshot 2026-01-04 at 12.36.35 AM.png

Edited by cranky
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our options for the HC position were limited, particularly by our own stupidity. Steichen had a poor virtual interview so we just ignored what he had been doing in Philly running a potent offense.

Canales wasn't on anyone else's radar. He's never been a HC and doesn't have the credentials to be an OC and HC. He was brought in to fix Bryce. It was a condition of being hired that Bryce was going to be his QB. No qualified HC is locking into a historically bad QB as his only option. 

DC is here because Tepper likes a certain type of person in charge and that's one he can tell what to do that won't push back. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Dave Canales is Dan Morgan's buddy from Seattle.& then Dan Morgan convinced David Tepper that he had a friend that could maximize the talent of Bryce Young by creating an offense specifically tailored for his certain type of skill set / strengths

& that's why Dave Canales is the head coach of the Carolina Panthers ...just saying 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, strato said:

hey everyone Bryce just needs the right coach. 
 

Lol, because he threw for over 200 today. I understand both sides of the argument. Would they say the same thing if Bryce had thrown for 100 yards and two picks today? He didn't though. He actually had a pretty good day, and it did look like play calling was more of the reason. And that's what we cannot seem to figure out. How much is BY and how much is Canales being the OC? Either way, we're still in purgatory.

Edited by Dragoon11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bandu said:

 Dave Canales is Dan Morgan's buddy from Seattle.& then Dan Morgan convinced David Tepper that he had a friend that could maximize the talent of Bryce Young by creating an offense specifically tailored for his certain type of skill set / strengths

& that's why Dave Canales is the head coach of the Carolina Panthers ...just saying 

I think your giving DM too much credit tbh.  Our owner has no idea wtf hes doing. He may be smart af when it comes to being an investor/raider but as an NFL owner hes dog poo. Like really bad at it.

DC probably was the only coach that would have even wanted to coach here after meeting Tepper.  I have never met him personally but he seems like a dick, figuratively and literally.

I have zero faith in him ever bringing Carolina Panthers a Superbowl.......ever

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dragoon11 said:

Lol, because he threw for over 200 today. I understand both sides of the argument. Would they say the same thing if Bryce had thrown for 100 yards and two picks today? He didn't though. He actually had a pretty good day, and it did look like play calling was more of the reason. And that's what we cannot seem to figure out. How much is BY and how much is Canales being the OC? Either way, we're still in purgatory.

Yeah, I don’t know. I am not a fan of Bryce’s in terms of him representing the NFL team I support. 
Canales… man I have been very lenient. He has finally gotten under my skin with his never ending supply of “championship” opportunities.

He has worked it out so that somehow, you can fail, but don’t you know the next week viola there you are again, in the midst of yet another championship opportunity.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because any decent HC wouldn't tie themselves to both Bryce and Tepper. 

Also Steichen's poor interview was from a Panther's leak so he probably just told them the truth and that was labeled 'poor' also known as correct in better organizations.

Bryce didn't have a bad game? Have you seen the offense required to have him under center? Lol. 14 points lol

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cranky said:

The first game of the season against the Jaguars and thier new rookie HC starting his first game and Canales was outcoached. Against the Saints and their new rookie head coach he was outcoached - twice. 

Watching the last several games with the questionable play calling, to say nothing of the lack of any consistancy in any area, I'm starting to wonder if he is up to the task.

Looking over his record with TB and Mayfield is interesting.

Here are Mayfields numbers with Canales verses Coen. The highlighted row is with Canales. As you can see, Mayfiled improved significantly in every catagory AFTER Canales left: yardage was up by 500, comp % was up 7%, TD's were up by 13 etc.

Then when you look at TBs' rushing numbers that year under Canales, it gets even worse as Tampa was dead last in rushing with Canales.

DEAD LAST

There is no doubt the Panthers have improved but I'm begining to wonder if Canales has hit his ceiling already.

 

Screenshot 2026-01-04 at 12.35.07 AM.png

Screenshot 2026-01-04 at 12.36.35 AM.png

I’ve been saying this. Dave is supposed to be an “offensive” head coach when our offense absolutely sucks ass. After two full years I still don’t know what our offensive identity is. We are certainly not a running team (we want to be). The only thing we do well is the 0-5 yard passing game. Never in my wildest dreams did I think I would focus and be happy if our qb had a game over 200 yards because it was so rare. Dave had ONE year of play calling and he wasn’t good that year! 

Edited by WarPanthers89
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...