Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wild Card QB Performance Rankings


thebdawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

Excited to see how some of y’all spin this one
 

Also interesting that Bryce’s QB rating was lower than Rodger’s, but total QBR almost 6x higher


IMG_5620.thumb.jpeg.d63049640a90504f9ffbd5429df8aa67.jpeg

look over at QB Rating....His is the lowest.....not that hard to spin...

  • Pie 8
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thebdawg said:

Excited to see how some of y’all spin this one
 

Also interesting that Bryce’s QB rating was lower than Rodger’s, but total QBR almost 6x higher


IMG_5620.thumb.jpeg.d63049640a90504f9ffbd5429df8aa67.jpeg

How am I supposed to be spinning this exactly?  I'm not going to compare him to the undead corpse of Aaron Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mav1234 said:

How am I supposed to be spinning this exactly?  I'm not going to compare him to the undead corpse of Aaron Rodgers.

Which one of these QBs would you not immediately trade Bryce for if given the chance? how about that spin? Not including Rodgers of course.

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, QBR is the one that is less subjective (basically the one that really matters). 

Total QBR is adjusted and based upon who you're playing.

Bryce did well, relative to who we were playing (and relative to what he normally does), but don't mistake it for a season's work.

Edited by TD alt
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so what i am seeing is he played alot better than stafford.....hmmmm...my eyes lied to me glad this fixed it and he actually was the third best playoff qb this weekend just sad everyone else on the team sucks and holds back his greatness ahahahahha

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I mean, QBR is the one that is less subjective (basically the one that really matters). 

Total QBR is adjusted and based upon who you're playing.

Bryce did well, relative to who we were playing (and relative to what he normally does), but don't mistake it for a season's work.

So easier to fabricate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

QBR is a proprietary statistic and ESPN won’t even fully reveal how they calculate it.

not sure how you get “less subjective” out of that. 

That's easy. Because I'm comparing it to "Total QBR." All of this is within the context of the chart. If you don't like QBR, then you're probably going to hate Total QBR worse.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...