Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schedule Release: Leaks and Rumors


Kentucky Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Thats not good on the front end I imagine

 

Looks like...

Q1 Home Away Away Home
Q2  ? ?  Home ?
Q3  Home ? Home Away ? 
Q4:  Home Away Home Home Home

with those question marks being either an away game or a bye week 

So sticking with the NFL plan of no team having three away games in a row

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#Panthers Home Schedule Leak:

Bears at Panthers - 09/13 - 1PM
Lions at Panthers - 10/04 - 8:20PM (SNF)
Buccaneers at Panthers - 10/25 - 1PM
Broncos at Panthers - 11/08 - 1PM
Ravens at Panthers - 11/22 - 1PM
Saints at Panthers - 12/13 - 1PM
Bengals at Panthers - 12/20 - 1PM
Seahawks at Panthers - 01/03 - 1PM
Falcons at Panthers - 01/10

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

A week 5 bye would fuggin suck

Add in the mini-bye is week 8, fuging awful....

I swear even without 18 games, NFL needs two bye weeks. 

weeks 3-7

 

weeks 9-13

 

More money cause you get another weekend of games and players would be healthier heading into playoffs. It works for everyone and did I mention more millions?!?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of those tougher matchups we've been going back and forth on definitely look more ideal at home. But if that leak is legit a bye week so early is the last thing we need especially given our slow starts the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...