Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chud....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Could we make it so he stays here min. two more years?

The ravens wrote something into the contract of DeCosta to ensure he can't move to other clubs for the duration of the contract. He only signed it because he's pretty much guarenteed Ozzie Newsome's job eventually. I don't think Chud would sign something like that unless we guarenteed him the HC position at the end of Rivera's contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does an asst head coach do? Adminstrivia and a few more meetings across defense and special teams? Just hope it doesn't take away from the offense and cause slippage.

Good for him though.

Basically just a pay raise.

I'm not sure Rivera would take too kindly to having any level of control taken after just one year on the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see anything wrong with it as long as it's clear that "assistant" is the operative term in the title. Chain of command is important. Rivera, as head coach, has to have the last say, and any other coaches working for the team have to be onboard with that. But if it results in a more integrated team concept and cohesive game strategies, and Chud gets the paycheck he clearly deserves, I'm down with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera as head coach will get to determine whether Chud gets more power. After he was the one that pushed to hire him and Chud was not the FOs choice for OC to begin with if I remember correctly.

So if Rivera wants to promote him I can't see a problem as long as it doesn't cause problems internally with the rest of the staff. As for a pay raise, with the kind of money the Panthers can generate due to a prolific offense and a return to the playoffs, it will be money well spent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it should have been in the plans already.

pay the man, give him a better parking spot and a new title on his office door and get back to work.

if it doesn't affect the salary cap (which it doesn't, durrrrp) then it shouldn't be a problem.

signed,

not my money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...