Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our Cap Isn't In Good Shape For 2013


fieryprophet

Recommended Posts

http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/69706/carolinas-nightmare-cap-situation

Whoever ends up as the new general manager is going to have his hands tied in a lot of ways, because most of those contracts include so much guaranteed in base salaries and so much pro-rated money that it’s difficult, if not impossible, to get out from under some of the team’s biggest contracts by releasing players.

The Panthers would lose cap space if they released Smith, Stewart or Godfrey. They’d basically break even on Anderson.

Beason and Williams could be candidates for release, but only if the Panthers designated them as June 1 cuts and spread their cap hit over two years, instead of one.

The Panthers currently have $136 million committed toward a 2013 salary cap that is expected to be slightly more than $120 million. Let’s look at some guys who could be on the cap bubble.

*sigh* :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was funny when so many people celebrated when we signed our core players to big deals, and now those same people are forced to understand how dumb some of those decisions were.

There will be a way, and a lot of people won't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll actually end up being lower then 136, more likely around 132. Restructure Beason and Gross - Will save around 7-9 Million combined. Cut Gamble, Nak and Edwards and that saves the team another 12 million and puts the team under the cap.

cut someone who's performed as one of the best corners in the league the last two years

the ideal scenario

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I have never been a fan of Freddy’s. I think he is a solid goalie but midnight will eventually strike with him in net.  During the playoffs Freddy was helped a lot from our defense not allowing many SOG and puck luck.  Any goalie only getting 10-14 shots against him is gonna look impressive on the stat sheet.  We need to do something about the goalie in the off-season. But if history is any indication we won’t. 
    • Maybe I’m ignorant, as I know sometimes the skaters can leave their goalie out to dry - but, I have not understood the love affair for Freddie.  I keep seeing the argument that he doesn’t make all of the saves, but he makes the ones that matter - but I’ve felt like that’s bullshit.  It’s relative easy to look good as a goalie when the other team was only getting 15 fuging shots a game. The thing that troubles me about last night, as anticipated, was that I knew it would be Freddie’s first real test in regards to a team that was deep enough and loaded enough to match us physically, and consistently.  And it seems once we’re not able to bully teams with the forecheck and force them out of being comfortable and they’re able to actually get SOG, then last night is the result. But, aside from me not trusting Freddie, none of the games I’ve watched this playoffs (I missed GM 1 vs Montreal), did we look so sloppy.  Sloppy passes, sloppy/non-existent reception of passes that did get through, sloppy puck handling… shots were pretty damn high-quality, we just had a much harder time getting into positions to shoot them.     Again, I know it might be over simplifying things, but we were almost dead even in SOG, and they won with both goalies having less than stellar save percentages as a result of the relatively low SOG for both teams with respect to the final score.  And that’s why I just haven’t trusted Freddie despite the halo of protection that most have when talking about him…  when a team’s skaters are close to or equal to ours, he doesn’t “save the ones we need.”
×
×
  • Create New...