Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jon Beason: Would we have been better off?


Evengelion

Recommended Posts

i kinda agree with the op. You did get a great player but you already decent player but the upgrade on the offensive line would have been great. I know everyone love keek and all but this is something serious to consider.

Keek takes over games, those two players would not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is under the assumption Beason would still remain healthy. The reason luke played mlb is because Beason got hurt. So if we didn't have luke Beason still goes down and our defense doesn't get to the top 10 by the end of the season. Then we come in this year with a questionable Beason and there's no way our defense plays as good to get us to 12-4. Ultimately the right move was made. Reif would have been a reach at 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i mean imagine if someone made a thread about some scenario where we could have gotten better value out of the pick spent on steve smith after the 2005 season

 

who gives a poo.  it's similar to the dummies who think cam's skill set, production, and potential grows on trees.  what kuechly brings is so ludicrously rare and valuable that the question is asinine and it doesn't matter what we spent to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All personal achievements for Keuchly and his family. I'm happy for him but doesn't exactly mean SBs for the panthers organization. We're in a perpetual rebuilding mode and contracts(including Keuchly's) is coming up. We could be going into this off season in search of only a franchise WR and some secondary help. Now we need a franchise LT, WR, and secondary. That's it very hard to get in one off season with no money and drafting bottom of the draft.

 

I see what you are saying but I would rather look at our future than this upcoming year.  Keek presents more value than any one tackle, receiver, db..  He makes everyone on the D better  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...