Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Viking game predictions...new beginning or the misery continues?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

I think we win because there's not an offensive player for Minnesota that scares me really. I think Luke and Davis can keep everything bottled up.

I think Cam rolls. Runs and passes all over the place.

Oh and I'm still hungover from Turkey day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we win because there's not an offensive player for Minnesota that scares me really. I think Luke and Davis can keep everything bottled up.

I think Cam rolls. Runs and passes all over the place.

Oh and I'm still hungover from Turkey day...

Patterson even if it's just kr/pr. And Asiata or however you spell it is pretty good.

But Patterson could ruin this game for us with special teams play. He is just that explosive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21-13 Vikings

 

Vikings defense is pretty underrated and tough and we get a garbage TD at the end.

 

Will be about 7-3 at halftime, but some second half turnovers make the defense say fug it and Vikes pull away. Shula gonna Shula, does Shula poo and still doesn't know how to coordinate an offense.

 

Ron still gives his Weekend and Bernie's impression on the sideline, and gives clueless answers to the press afterwards.

 

Several huddlers then scramble to write up about how we're still winning out and running the table, while immediately losing their poo when someone suggests that maybe we just aren't a good team. "Fan levels" are challenged and it becomes a contest to see who gave JR the most money these past 20 years.

 

So, pretty much a repeat of what we've seen pretty much every week since after the Lions game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...