Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Atlanta is a favorable matchup


Verge

Recommended Posts

Player for player, we match up very well against them.

 

They have zero pass rush, and we have a mediocre line, I would not expect much pressure from Osi or Kroy.

 

They have an awful o-line, and their top tackle will not be assigned to Charles Johnson, who is playing like a top five DE the last five weeks.

 

Their best weapon is Julio Jones, he will be shadowed all game by Josh Norman, who has worked wonders against top receivers.

 

Their running game is not special, and Kuechly + Star should pretty much eliminate it all together, think, 2.1 ypc.

 

The Falcons are 1-9 against mobile qbs the last two seasons, they do not have anyone who can spy on a mobile qb, and they cannot create enough separation on the edges to contain them, which means Cam should go nuts.

 

They are straight awful against teams who are run first and have a physical defense, I can't think of the last physical team they have beat.

 

All in all, it would be tough to lose this game, if White goes nuts on the other side it could be tough sledding, but either way, I think we win in style.

 

Panthers - 24

Falcons - 13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can capitalize in the red zone we will win.  If we do our usual :

 

1st down:  Run for no gain or lob to KB in which he drops or the ball is overthrown

 

2nd down: KB lob if it wasn't on first down or Stretch run to the outside

 

3rd down:  Olsen drag on PA, Or spread no back looking for KB corner route or  Avant square in.

 

4th down: Gano.

 

We won't win kicking FG.  Atlanta has 2 many weapons to shut out.  However our ball control and running game should keep the ball out of their hands.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game is going to come down to the offense. They need to be very careful with Hester on special teams. I'm not convinced that they can contain Atlanta's offense all 4 quarters. Cam is going to have to get touchdowns. Field goals won't cut it this time around. Look what happened the last game we played them. 24-20 Panthers. As usual it's going to come down to stopping them from scoring a touchdown on the last drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While most points you made are mostly true, both of their lines have played better of late, like ours have.

I think the Panthers are a better team, and should win by about 10, but our special teams scare me, as well as Byron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While most points you made are mostly true, both of their lines have played better of late, like ours have.

I think the Panthers are a better team, and should win by about 10, but our special teams scare me, as well as Byron.

I think we have the better overall O and D.

Special teams is Atl.

Special teams is scary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...