Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mr. Richardson did flex muscles regarding Hardy


dswofford

Recommended Posts

I had the opportunity of meeting JR 3 times. He's a class act and very nice human being. He's very professional and courteous and expects people in his organization to act the same. He runs football team like a professional organization and he will not stand for unprofessional misconduct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any influence he had on Hardy not playing directly impacted an acquitted man helping he and the Carolinas win the Lombardi he nor we have ever had. What a golden opportunity under Cam's rookie deal lost.

Is this a joke

When you look at our roster do you think to yourself that all we need to be a serious title contender is an all pro DE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't he do the "right thing" when Steve Smith 89 was cracking team mates skulls?

Big difference between fighting with a teammate and hitting a woman.

An even bigger difference now in the post Ray Rice era.

Whatever chance Hardy might have had to stay here before completely vanished when the Ray Rice story blew up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why didn't he do the "right thing" when Steve Smith 89 was cracking team mates skulls?

 

There is a double standard when it comes to male and female violence. Had Hardy thrown a man into a bed full of guns he would still be on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

given the current climate against domestic abuse, especially in the NFL....I don't think he had much of a choice. Look at the public backlash the Cowgirls are dealing with since signing Hardy. Hell even Dallas' mayor poo poo'd on the signing. My entire lunch break today consisted of listening to Skip and Steven A. bash everything to do with Hardy AND bash NC's judicial process.

 

Now of course all of this will blow over come football time.... but no one even knows if Hardy will even PLAY this coming year. We're gonna sign him again not even knowing what kind of suspension he's going to get? Nope.

 

And you know that the Rae Carruth fiasco is still fresh on the Big Cat's mind. No way in seven Hells he would be a Panther this year.

 

Some of you just need to get over it. Relax. Chill. Enjoy the splendor that is ACC Basketball right now and just shut the eff up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy embarrassed Mr. Richardson publicly and basically robbed him, too. So yeah, I could understand how he feels even though I think the media blew it way out proportion.

At least he admitted that he had something to do with it.

Smartest thing you've ever posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
    • The natural progression of ANY QB is to take more control of the offense.  Which is all Dave said. He doesn't have a narrative to push. He is says what is the natural thing to say in this situation whether it's Bryce, or any other QB.  THE THREAD TITLE ALONE TWISTS THE NARRATIVE.   so yes, many of you refuse to acknowledge anything other than your screwed perspective, for whatever reason, when it comes to Bryce.  Y'all have a great Easter. 
×
×
  • Create New...