Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bulletin Board Material: 2-0? ESPN is not buying it

ncmonzta

By ncmonzta,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ncmonzta Contributor

ncmonzta

Posted
Posted

Carolina Panthers

63.1 percent playoff odds, up from 33.3 percent

Carolina's first two wins have not been extraordinary, but they weren't close either. The Panthers controlled both games with their defense, which ranks No. 3 in DVOA through two games. In 120 minutes of football, the Panthers have not trailed, but their only lead of two touchdowns lasted just 2:22.

It's also tough to judge whether Carolina's two victories came over easier opponents than Atlanta's two victories. Going into the season, it certainly looked as though the Eagles and Giants were better teams than the Jaguars and Texans. But if Blake Bortles really has taken a step forward, the Panthers look pretty impressive for holding him under 200 yards with two picks. One obvious concern: the offense, which doesn't really look any better than we thought it would before the season. Jonathan Stewart is averaging only 3.4 yards per carry and the passing game definitely misses Kelvin Benjamin.

Much like Atlanta, the Panthers are a mediocre team with an easy schedule. But their easy schedule isn't quite as easy as Atlanta's -- and Tony Romo might be back by the time Carolina travels to Dallas in Week 12.

For real? No, but like Atlanta, the schedule keeps them in the playoff hunt. Our simulation says the two NFC teams with the highest chance of a wild-card spot are Carolina and Atlanta.

 From Espn Insider. http://espn.go.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/13728467/analyzing-which-2-0-teams-real-contenders-nfl .

Haters gonna hate

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daddy_Uncle Grand Master

Daddy_Uncle

Posted
Posted

You  win in the NFL with defense. NOT flashy running backs and receivers. That has been proven over and over and over. Look at a lot of the past Super Bowl teams. Great defenses with mediocre to decent offenses. We are better than Atlanta because our defense. I don't give a poo about strength of schedule. Cam has become a great leader on offense and doing what we need him to do. We are controlling the time of possession and playing great defense. That's how you win in the NFL. not by how many flashy offensive players you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VerticalThreat Newbie

VerticalThreat

Posted
Posted

If it makes them feel better, if I had the choice I wouldn't by ESPN either. This team is good. Not great, not elite, but it's a team that can sustain and knows how it can win ballgames. It's not sexy - to outsiders, although it really is fun football - so I don't expect them to buy it, nor do I really want them to.

It will be so much sweeter when "SOMEHOW" we lucked into a 12-4 / 11-5 record. Keep pounding, BSPN, keep pounding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KB_fan Proficient

KB_fan

Posted
Posted

63.1 percent playoff odds, up from 33.3 percent

Carolina's first two wins have not been extraordinary, but they weren't close either. The Panthers controlled both games with their defense, which ranks No. 3 in DVOA through two games. In 120 minutes of football, the Panthers have not trailed, but their only lead of two touchdowns lasted just 2:22.

 

 WRONG!!!!!

We have trailed. 3-0 against Texans. 

Exactly.  You beat me to it.   If they can't get even that simple fact correct, it shows you how much the rest of their analysis is worth.

We trailed for 3 drives against Houston - about 7 minutes of the game.  Here's the relevant section of my gamebook spreadsheet:

time_trailing.thumb.png.6d099e9d1a741021

Time and drives when the score was tied (including 0 - 0) don't show up above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Flux

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Aussie Tank
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • Jackie Lee
      Vrabel and Russini? Athletic investigating.

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...