Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why you don't pay a zone corner top corner money

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Ricky Spanish Grand Master

Ricky Spanish

Posted
Posted

Just put your best receiver on the other side of the field and spam the crap out of those plays. 

To his Credit, Norman has played well when the ball goes his way. Problem is you don't need to throw the ball his way when the rest of the defense isn't that good. Why bother? 

So congrats Norman, you're locking up your side of the field. No one else seems to be able to though. He might have a good year again, but I seriously doubt the Skins D does better than ours this year. We might have young inexperienced corners, but we still have Luke and TD. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

2644961-transferir.jpg

He's actually right.

Why the hell would you pay a guy like the top corner in the league and then stick him in a scheme that allows opponents to just shift away from him?

If you're going to pay him like a shutdown corner, use him as a shutdown corner.

And if you don't believe it he's a shutdown corner, why the hell did you pay him like one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Growl said:

Being able to completely remove an entire side of the field is probably one of the most valuable thing a player can bring. Most teams would take that over a dominant LT or a threatening DE.

 

 

I wouldn't go that far, if there is a dominant DE or LT in the draft I picking them over a CB everytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

He's actually right.

Why the hell would you pay a guy like the top corner in the league and then stick him in a scheme that allows opponents to just shift away from him?

If you're going to pay him like a shutdown corner, use him as a shutdown corner.

And if you don't believe it he's a shutdown corner, why the hell did you pay him like one?

The money he's being paid, he should stick to #1's like glue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...