Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Releasing Tolbert is a cap savings of 1.5 million


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Releasing Soliai creates an extra $2.5 million & releasing Dickson creates an extra $2.1 million. That along with Tolbert's $1.5 million would be an $6.1 cap savings. Replace them with low salary capped players at about 700k per year would yield a savings of $4 million. 

Stewart & Gano are tricky because them being cut would save $4.75 million and $3.1 million respectively but both are still solid contributors. If we replace them with low capped players there would be a savings of around $6.4 million. 

Overall we could increase the cap by over $10 million by making those moves. 

Does anyone understand how Oher retiring would affect the cap? Since he would be retiring and not getting cut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart, while when healthy is one of the best backs in the NFL is one of the biggest liabilities on the offense, he is a week to week 'iffy' player when game day comes and I'd rather not have that going forward.  

We need to think long and hard about trying to invest in a solid kicker that can be with this team for 10+ years...Tucker is a rare find but we need to replace our kicker with someone more dependent when its time to get some points on the board.  

Dickson is completely replaceable and no need for him to 'contribute' further to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AndrewLaskoski said:

Releasing Soliai creates an extra $2.5 million & releasing Dickson creates an extra $2.1 million. That along with Tolbert's $1.5 million would be an $6.1 cap savings. Replace them with low salary capped players at about 700k per year would yield a savings of $4 million. 

Stewart & Gano are tricky because them being cut would save $4.75 million and $3.1 million respectively but both are still solid contributors. If we replace them with low capped players there would be a savings of around $6.4 million. 

Overall we could increase the cap by over $10 million by making those moves. 

Does anyone understand how Oher retiring would affect the cap? Since he would be retiring and not getting cut?

All possible candidates (maybe Gano is the safest).

Oher would save $2.5 mil as cut in the offseason and I'm pretty sure retirement would be treated the same.  Assuming Larsen says hot, Gradkowski would be a $750,000 cap savings as well.  I'd even consider looking at Anderson's $1.75 mil savings and look to start coaching up a young backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...