Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 2017 NFL Draft Day 2 - 2nd/3rd Round - Discussion Thread

tiger7_88

By tiger7_88,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, CPcavedweller said:

One problem I see is that he's a body catcher. He doesn't attack the ball and that could lead to some frustrating Ted Ginn like moments. If we don't see Shula evolve this system into something more, we aren't going to see any improvements with these players we've drafted. 

Well that's the whole goddam point isn't it?

Instead of running it on 1st and 2nd down and throwing long on 3rd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
Just now, CPcavedweller said:

One problem I see is that he's a body catcher. He doesn't attack the ball and that could lead to some frustrating Ted Ginn like moments. If we don't see Shula evolve this system into something more, we aren't going to see any improvements with these players we've drafted. 

They'll be here for the next OC....

You don't skip drafting offense just because your OC is one of the worst ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

We've had Ted Ginn. However, with Funchess's shiftiness and Kelvins ability to catch everything, having a speed guy who can cut on a dime can't hurt. I just don't think he's a second round receiver. 

CBS had him going in the 2nd and ranked him as the 4th best WR in the draft. He looks like a better (hopefully) Philly Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
Just now, thennek said:

The Samuels pick..... The Panthers are finally admitting that big slow receivers are not making it happen.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Pretty much. Maybe they read that article about exactly how much separation our receivers not named Ted Ginn were getting last year and how Cam had to throw in insanely tight windows to make poo happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • d-dave
      Something new to argue vehemently about.

      By d-dave · Posted

      That's pretty cool.  I don't care about the garbage versus not-garbage time non-sense.  You play what you have to play, and everyone has garbage time one way or another. After all, if you don't win before the game starts, then are you really a winner?  Isn't it all garbage time anyway?  (Sarcasm with a capital S)
    • cranky
      Where do you fall on the Bryce Young spectrum?

      By cranky · Posted

      Not cherry picking when I was simply addressing the point of too many ints and I see no reason why Bryces should be "drastically" higher especially given the fact that Newton had Steve Smith, Greg Olsen and Brad Lafell to throw to while Bryce had Theileln, Mingo, and Johnson. If anything, Bryce should have been worse but since you accuse me of cherry picking, I'll add this: Newton completed 57.7 % of his passes with the Pro Bowl players; Young completed 60.9% even with inferior talent to throw to.
    • Cpt slay a ho
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By Cpt slay a ho · Posted

      Perfectly understandable 
×
×
  • Create New...