Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vague Worley tweet

TN05

By TN05,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

If he hadn't whined about his role before, including this week...this probably wouldn't have been that big of a deal.

it's starting to become  habit for him. when things aren't going his way on the team this year regarding his role, he takes to twitter or to the press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Raskle Contributor

Raskle

Posted
Posted

I'm going to to take the "wait and see" approach when it comes to something as ambiguous as this tweet is. It may be exactly what folks are jumping all over him for, but it also might just be innocuous and he's excited to finally get back to playing football, since we have the Monday Night game.

 

I'm really hoping it's the latter, but won't cry if it's the former and he gets shown the door. No place on this team for media players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Asurfaholic Newbie

Asurfaholic

Posted
Posted

So looking for a honest and rational understanding of whether or not he actually sucks. 

I know he gets picked on, and maybe he is the weakest link- but doesn't every team have a "weakest link?" Not everyone can be the Luuuke of their positions, and no matter if you were to bench him, someone else becomes the weakest link. Seymour provides a honest competition at his spot and maybe he handles his specific duties better (man coverage vs coverage) but even still the weakest link shifts somewhere else. 

To my own eyes he is servicable and a mostly reliable cornerback. I've seen Bradberry get burned and the safeties get embarrassed too so it's not like we have a super spectacular crew back there wrecking games... they do well mostly because of the strength of the line and linebackers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

So looking for a honest and rational understanding of whether or not he actually sucks. 

I know he gets picked on, and maybe he is the weakest link- but doesn't every team have a "weakest link?" Not everyone can be the Luuuke of their positions, and no matter if you were to bench him, someone else becomes the weakest link. Seymour provides a honest competition at his spot and maybe he handles his specific duties better (man coverage vs coverage) but even still the weakest link shifts somewhere else. 

To my own eyes he is servicable and a mostly reliable cornerback. I've seen Bradberry get burned and the safeties get embarrassed too so it's not like we have a super spectacular crew back there wrecking games... they do well mostly because of the strength of the line and linebackers.

Getting picked on every snap you're on the field usually means you suck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...