Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok, so who do you want to face if we are on the road round 1


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

LA.

A loss to LA would sting less than losing to the Saints for the 3rd time this season.

I’ll roll the dice in LA rather than going to NO where we already know we can’t win.

Much like the WR thing, give me some guy off the couch as a wildcard versus sticking with what we already know isn’t going to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not an easy call...we just don't match up with the Saints this year, but the Rams are coming together with a healthy Gurley, who looks like the MVP.

also before the "hard to beat a team 3 times in a year" stuff comes along..

 

All week, you will hear the self-proclaimed experts tell you it is difficult to beat a team three times in one season.

They will sit in their fancy studios and use that logic to explain why the Eagles are going to beat Dallas next weekend.

Clearly, these pundits of prognostication do not have access to the Internet. If they did, they could do some research and realize that since the NFL merger in 1970, the team that won the previous two meetings against its divisional rival has a 12-7 record.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/319153-beating-a-team-three-times-in-one-season-easier-done-than-said

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints. Go back and punch them in the face. 

If we let them beat us three times in one year we don't deserve to go any further. 

Saints are the best in the NFC right now. We'd have to face them at some point. Rams won't be able to stop them right now.

I think it's up to us to prevent a saints vs pats Superbowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...