Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Browns take 2 QBs?


Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/browns-have-reportedly-considered-drafting-two-quarterbacks-with-high-round-picks/

I don't think they would do it but if they did how would it mess up the draft for everyone.  Seems players we are targeting would rise up the board.

I could see them taking Barkley 1st and whoever remains standing at QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see this ever happening but it is the Browns we’re talking about

I thinks it’s more probable that Cleveland is floating this rumor on purpose so that they get a desperate team to trade up to pick #4. Especially since some teams feel the top tier of QBs consists of 4 guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a terrible idea if they are thinking of using both #1 and #4 on QBs. In that regard, you automatically lose one impact player, as only one QB can be on the field at the same time. They could easily get a QB and another potentially high impact guy (Barkley, Chubb, Fitzpatrick, etc.). Now, if they are talking using either #1 or #4 plus a second or third round pick, that would potentially make more sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would be pretty stupid tbh. Shows a complete lack of scouting. I could see a cluster fug. They'd be switching back and forth never settling on one guy. The QB room would breed tension and a lack of faith in either QB. They need to figure out who their guy is. Draft him #1, then take Barkley at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am in Cleveland for a week (about 50 miles below it)--I have spoken to some Browns fans.  People, these fans are something else.  I felt like the new member of the platoon joining a group of soldiers who have seen everything war has to offer.  They feel that Josh Allen is a mistake.  They want Darnold at #1 or Mayfield at #4. 

One compared this draft to the Richardson/Manziel draft.  I told him that Farmer is no longer the Browns GM--but he added that the owner is the problem.  I replied, "no, your last owner was the problem (Modell)."

Imagine having the cap room and the free agents they have coming in, the draft picks, and still feeling nearly hopeless.  I asked everyone what they hoped for--All said between 4 and 6 wins.  One crackhead said 9 wins is a lock.

I think they will win 6 to 7.  For this place, that might  be enough to restore faith.  The fan base has been taken off life support, and with the Indians and Cavs, the Browns are easy to forget.  I want them to have a great draft and play well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

I read this yesterday... and i can honestly say I would not blame the browns if they did it.  They have been whiffing on quarterbacks for years. Bring in two guys to compete and trade the left over.

actually a good idea. They have plenty of picks, and this would ensure them plenty next year as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hotsauce said:

 hypothetically, would you take a deal from for CAM if the Browns if gave us:

2018 2x 1st picks

2019 1st pick

2020 1st pick

And their pro bowl Guard Joel Bitonio

Why would you trade a Pro-Bowl QB in the prime of his career?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "If only Bryce were <height>", he'd <insert stupid thing here>" was the bit and in direct response to multiple posters ridiculously blaming Bryce (and only Bryce) for the punt returns vs. New England. :3 I understand that folks desire balance, hence the "Bryce stans vs. Bryce haters" narrative but it's abundantly clear that the only people going into threads just to talk about Bryce are the haters. Meanwhile, daring to disagree that Bryce was completely at fault for something that happened on special teams gets the "stan" label. Shoot, I'm sure folks lump me in as a Bryce stan (Brycen stan? Absolutely. Bryce stan? Nah) just because I have the audacity to look at what the rest of the team is and isn't doing. 😛  
    • PJ Walker is the only QB in the Tepper era the Panthers managed to find wins with.  Only QB w/ a winning record.    PJ had success in pro ball before the Panthers.  He he had NFL tools.    He just is consistent and unreliable.  PJ Walker is what you call a bad/poor man's gunslinger.  He can provide highs and lows both virtually guaranteed.  He is NFL depth.  Bryce Young hasn't proven to improve a teams chances of winning better than the PJ Walker tier of QBing. PJ Walker can do things Bryce Young can't......and that a problem     
    • There isn’t but the thing is the team/system/staff around the QB ultimately dictates how successful that QB can be. You have Baker getting released midseason here vs playing like a MVP on another team. Darnold on the Jets/Panthers vs Vikings/Seahawks. Geno Smith on the Jets vs the Seahawks vs the Raiders. Mac Jones is looking as good as Purdy on the 49ers. You have to build a roster, culture, and system for these guys.  Obviously the QB has to be the leader and help elevate the team, but we are seeing what moving a “bad” QB to a stable franchise looks like. Daniel Jones might be doing the same but it’s too early to tell. 
×
×
  • Create New...